Suppr超能文献

私营保险残疾儿童的专科使用情况。

Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities.

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14199. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14199. Epub 2023 Jul 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate primary care practice ownership and specialist-use patterns for commercially insured children with disabilities.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING

A national commercial claims database and the Health Systems and Provider Database from 2012 to 2016 are the data sources for this study.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional, descriptive study examines: (1) the most visited type of pediatric primary care physician and practice (independent or system-owned); (2) pediatric and non-pediatric specialist-use patterns; and (3) how practice ownership relates to specialist-use patterns.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: This study identifies 133,749 person-years of commercially insured children with disabilities aged 0-18 years with at least 24 months of continuous insurance coverage by linking a national commercial claims data set with the Health Systems and Provider Database and applying the validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Three-quarters (75.9%) of children with disabilities received their pediatric primary care in independent practices. Nearly two thirds (59.6%) used at least one specialist with 45.1% using nonpediatric specialists, 28.8% using pediatric ones, and 17.0% using both. Specialist-use patterns varied by both child age and specialist type. Children with disabilities in independent practices were as likely to see a specialist as those in system-owned ones: 57.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.7%-57.4%) versus 57.3% (95% CI 56.6%-58.0%), respectively (p = 0.635). The percent using two or more types of specialists was 46.1% (95% CI 45.4%-46.7%) in independent practices, comparable to that in systems 47.1% (95% CI 46.2%-48.0%) (p = 0.054). However, the mean number of specialist visits was significantly lower in independent practices than in systems-4.0 (95% CI 3.9%-4.0%) versus 4.4 (95% CI 4.3%-4.6%) respectively-reaching statistical significance with p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing how privately insured children with disabilities use pediatric primary care from pediatric and nonpediatric primary care specialists through both independent and system-owned practices is important for improving care quality and value.

摘要

目的

研究商业保险覆盖的残疾儿童的初级保健实践所有权和专科医生使用模式。

数据来源和研究设置

本研究的数据来源是一个国家商业索赔数据库和 2012 年至 2016 年的医疗系统和提供者数据库。

研究设计

这是一项横断面、描述性研究,研究内容包括:(1)最常访问的儿科初级保健医生和实践类型(独立或系统所有);(2)儿科和非儿科专科医生使用模式;(3)实践所有权与专科医生使用模式的关系。

数据收集/提取方法:通过将国家商业索赔数据集与医疗系统和提供者数据库相链接,并应用经过验证的残疾儿童算法,本研究确定了 133749 个人年的商业保险覆盖的残疾儿童数据,这些儿童年龄在 0-18 岁之间,至少有 24 个月的连续保险覆盖。

主要发现

四分之三(75.9%)的残疾儿童在独立诊所接受儿科初级保健。近三分之二(59.6%)的儿童至少使用了一名专科医生,其中 45.1%使用非儿科专科医生,28.8%使用儿科专科医生,17.0%同时使用两种。专科医生的使用模式因儿童年龄和专科医生类型而异。在独立诊所就诊的残疾儿童与在系统所有诊所就诊的儿童看专科医生的可能性一样:57.1%(95%置信区间[95%CI]56.7%-57.4%)与 57.3%(95%CI 56.6%-58.0%)(p=0.635)。在独立诊所使用两种或两种以上类型专科医生的比例为 46.1%(95%CI 45.4%-46.7%),与系统中的 47.1%(95%CI 46.2%-48.0%)相当(p=0.054)。然而,独立实践中的专科医生就诊次数明显低于系统中的专科医生就诊次数-分别为 4.0(95%CI 3.9%-4.0%)和 4.4(95%CI 4.3%-4.6%),差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。

结论

认识到私人保险覆盖的残疾儿童如何通过儿科和非儿科初级保健专家在独立和系统所有的实践中使用儿科初级保健对于提高护理质量和价值非常重要。

相似文献

1
Specialist use among privately insured children with disabilities.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14199. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14199. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Consistency and Adequacy of Public and Commercial Health Insurance for US Children, 2016 to 2021.
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Nov 3;4(11):e234179. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4179.
4
Grommets (ventilation tubes) for recurrent acute otitis media in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 9;5(5):CD012017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012017.pub2.
6
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Financing the "Village": Establishing a Sustainable Financial System for Child Behavioral Health.
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2024 Jul;33(3):457-470. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2024.03.008.

本文引用的文献

1
Organization and Performance of US Health Systems.
JAMA. 2023 Jan 24;329(4):325-335. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24032.
3
Patterns of Use of a Price Transparency Tool for Childbirth Among Pregnant Individuals With Commercial Insurance.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21410.
4
Geographic Variation In The Consolidation Of Physicians Into Health Systems, 2016-18.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jan;40(1):165-169. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00812.
5
Pediatric Hospital Services Within a One-Hour Drive: A National Study.
Pediatrics. 2020 Nov;146(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-1724.
6
Intellectual and developmental disability and COVID-19 case-fatality trends: TriNetX analysis.
Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100942. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100942. Epub 2020 May 24.
7
Life Expectancy of Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer Over 3 Decades.
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;6(3):350-357. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5582.
8
Care Quality and Spending Among Commercially Insured Children With Disabilities.
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Apr;19(3):291-299. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
9
A Comprehensive Theory of Integration.
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):196-207. doi: 10.1177/1077558718767000. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
Medical Group Structural Integration May Not Ensure That Care Is Integrated, From The Patient's Perspective.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):885-892. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0909.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验