Division of General Pediatrics, Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14199. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14199. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
To investigate primary care practice ownership and specialist-use patterns for commercially insured children with disabilities.
A national commercial claims database and the Health Systems and Provider Database from 2012 to 2016 are the data sources for this study.
This cross-sectional, descriptive study examines: (1) the most visited type of pediatric primary care physician and practice (independent or system-owned); (2) pediatric and non-pediatric specialist-use patterns; and (3) how practice ownership relates to specialist-use patterns.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: This study identifies 133,749 person-years of commercially insured children with disabilities aged 0-18 years with at least 24 months of continuous insurance coverage by linking a national commercial claims data set with the Health Systems and Provider Database and applying the validated Children with Disabilities Algorithm.
Three-quarters (75.9%) of children with disabilities received their pediatric primary care in independent practices. Nearly two thirds (59.6%) used at least one specialist with 45.1% using nonpediatric specialists, 28.8% using pediatric ones, and 17.0% using both. Specialist-use patterns varied by both child age and specialist type. Children with disabilities in independent practices were as likely to see a specialist as those in system-owned ones: 57.1% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 56.7%-57.4%) versus 57.3% (95% CI 56.6%-58.0%), respectively (p = 0.635). The percent using two or more types of specialists was 46.1% (95% CI 45.4%-46.7%) in independent practices, comparable to that in systems 47.1% (95% CI 46.2%-48.0%) (p = 0.054). However, the mean number of specialist visits was significantly lower in independent practices than in systems-4.0 (95% CI 3.9%-4.0%) versus 4.4 (95% CI 4.3%-4.6%) respectively-reaching statistical significance with p < 0.0001.
Recognizing how privately insured children with disabilities use pediatric primary care from pediatric and nonpediatric primary care specialists through both independent and system-owned practices is important for improving care quality and value.
研究商业保险覆盖的残疾儿童的初级保健实践所有权和专科医生使用模式。
本研究的数据来源是一个国家商业索赔数据库和 2012 年至 2016 年的医疗系统和提供者数据库。
这是一项横断面、描述性研究,研究内容包括:(1)最常访问的儿科初级保健医生和实践类型(独立或系统所有);(2)儿科和非儿科专科医生使用模式;(3)实践所有权与专科医生使用模式的关系。
数据收集/提取方法:通过将国家商业索赔数据集与医疗系统和提供者数据库相链接,并应用经过验证的残疾儿童算法,本研究确定了 133749 个人年的商业保险覆盖的残疾儿童数据,这些儿童年龄在 0-18 岁之间,至少有 24 个月的连续保险覆盖。
四分之三(75.9%)的残疾儿童在独立诊所接受儿科初级保健。近三分之二(59.6%)的儿童至少使用了一名专科医生,其中 45.1%使用非儿科专科医生,28.8%使用儿科专科医生,17.0%同时使用两种。专科医生的使用模式因儿童年龄和专科医生类型而异。在独立诊所就诊的残疾儿童与在系统所有诊所就诊的儿童看专科医生的可能性一样:57.1%(95%置信区间[95%CI]56.7%-57.4%)与 57.3%(95%CI 56.6%-58.0%)(p=0.635)。在独立诊所使用两种或两种以上类型专科医生的比例为 46.1%(95%CI 45.4%-46.7%),与系统中的 47.1%(95%CI 46.2%-48.0%)相当(p=0.054)。然而,独立实践中的专科医生就诊次数明显低于系统中的专科医生就诊次数-分别为 4.0(95%CI 3.9%-4.0%)和 4.4(95%CI 4.3%-4.6%),差异具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。
认识到私人保险覆盖的残疾儿童如何通过儿科和非儿科初级保健专家在独立和系统所有的实践中使用儿科初级保健对于提高护理质量和价值非常重要。