CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming, 650201, China.
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, North Ryde, 2113, New South Wales, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Dec;98(6):2078-2090. doi: 10.1111/brv.12997. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
Floral nectar production is central to plant pollination, and hence to human wellbeing. As floral nectar is essentially a solution in water of various sugars, it is likely a valuable plant resource, especially in terms of energy, with plants experiencing costs/trade-offs associated with its production or absorption and adopting mechanisms to regulate nectar in flowers. Possible costs of nectar production may also influence the evolution of nectar volume, concentration and composition, of pollination syndromes involving floral nectar, and the production of some crops. There has been frequent agreement that costs of floral nectar production are significant, but relevant evidence is scant and difficult to interpret. Convincing direct evidence comes from experimental studies that relate either enhanced nectar sugar production (through repeated nectar removal) to reduced ability to produce seeds, or increased sugar availability (through absorption of additional artificial nectar) to increased seed production. Proportions of available photosynthate allocated by plants to nectar production may also indicate nectar cost. However, such studies are rare, some do not include treatments of all (or almost all) flowers per plant, and all lack quantitative cost-benefit comparisons for nectar production. Additional circumstantial evidence of nectar cost is difficult to interpret and largely equivocal. Future research should repeat direct experimental approaches that relate reduced or enhanced nectar sugar availability for a plant with consequent ability to produce seeds. To avoid confounding effects of inter-flower resource transfer, each plant should experience a single treatment, with treatment of all or almost all flowers per plant. Resource allocation by plants, pathways used for resource transfer, and the locations of resource sources and sinks should also be investigated. Future research should also consider extension of nectar cost into other areas of biology. For example, evolutionary models of nectar production are rare but should be possible if plant fitness gains and costs associated with nectar production are expressed in the same currency, such as energy. It should then be possible to understand observed nectar production for different plant species and pollination syndromes involving floral nectar. In addition, potential economic benefits should be possible to assess if relationships between nectar production and crop value are evaluated.
花的花蜜生产是植物授粉的核心,因此也是人类健康的关键。由于花蜜本质上是一种由各种糖组成的水溶液,它可能是一种有价值的植物资源,尤其是在能量方面,因为植物在生产或吸收花蜜时会产生成本/权衡,并采用机制来调节花朵中的花蜜。花蜜生产的可能成本也可能影响涉及花蜜的授粉综合征的花蜜量、浓度和组成的进化,以及一些作物的生产。人们普遍认为花蜜生产的成本很高,但相关证据很少,难以解释。令人信服的直接证据来自于实验研究,这些研究要么通过重复去除花蜜来增加花蜜中糖的产量,从而降低植物产生种子的能力,要么通过吸收额外的人工花蜜来增加糖的可用性,从而增加种子的产量。植物分配给花蜜生产的可用光合作用产物的比例也可能表明花蜜的成本。然而,这样的研究很少,有些研究没有包括对每株植物的所有(或几乎所有)花朵进行处理,而且所有研究都缺乏花蜜生产的定量成本效益比较。花蜜成本的其他间接证据难以解释,而且大多是模棱两可的。未来的研究应该重复直接的实验方法,即研究植物花蜜中糖的可用性降低或增加与随后产生种子的能力之间的关系。为了避免花朵之间资源转移的混杂效应,每株植物都应该只接受一种处理,并且对每株植物的所有或几乎所有花朵进行处理。还应该研究植物的资源分配、资源转移的途径以及资源来源和汇的位置。未来的研究还应该考虑将花蜜成本扩展到生物学的其他领域。例如,关于花蜜生产的进化模型很少,但如果与花蜜生产相关的植物适应性收益和成本可以用相同的货币(如能量)来表示,那么这样的模型应该是可能的。然后,就有可能理解不同植物物种和涉及花蜜的授粉综合征的花蜜生产。此外,如果评估花蜜生产与作物价值之间的关系,就有可能评估潜在的经济利益。