Key Laboratory of Strategic Mineral Resources of the Upper Yellow River, Ministry of Natural Resources & School of Earth Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Key Laboratory of Geochemical Exploration, Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, CAGS, Langfang, 065000, China; UNESCO International Center on Global-scale Geochemistry, Langfang, 065000, China.
Environ Res. 2023 Oct 15;235:116695. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116695. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
Understanding the impact of different industrial activities on heavy metals and conducting scientific ecological risk assessments are critical to the management of heavy metal pollution. The present study compared soils affected by different industrial activities in three types of industrial cities (coal city, oil-gas city, and economic city) to control samples and examined the ecological risk based on bioavailability in the Middle Yellow River Basin. The findings revealed that the impact characteristics of different industrial activities on soil heavy metals in the research area were different. Both coal-based and oil-gas industry activities had a minor impact on soil heavy metals, whereas economic industry activities in the southern part had a major impact, as evidenced by significant enrichment of Cd, Hg, Cu, Pb, and Zn. In principal component analysis, the soil heavy metals affected by economic industry activities designated a distinct source from the control samples, particularly the anthropogenic sources represented by Hg and Cd. In the context of heavy metals in chemical form, three types of industrial activities all had an effect on bioavailability (0.72-24.27%) and could increase migratory activity in the environment. Furthermore, both traditional and improved assessments, based on total content and bioavailability, showed a low ecological risk near coal cities and oil-gas cities in the middle and northern parts, while there was a medium-high ecological risk near economically developed cities in the south, particularly Tianshui, Baoji, Qishan, Xianyang, Xi'an, and Tongchuan. In comparison, improved risk assessment based on bioavailability tends to not only compensate for an overestimation in traditional risk assessment from the perspective of total content, but additionally achieve a more reasonable, effective, and advanced assessment of heavy metal risks in scientific research. The outcome of this study has significance for the ecological conservation and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin.
了解不同工业活动对重金属的影响,并进行科学的生态风险评估,对于重金属污染的治理至关重要。本研究比较了黄河流域三种类型工业城市(煤城、油气城和经济城)受不同工业活动影响的土壤与对照样,并基于生物有效性对生态风险进行了评估。结果表明,研究区不同工业活动对土壤重金属的影响特征不同。煤基和油气工业活动对土壤重金属的影响较小,而南部经济工业活动的影响较大,表现为 Cd、Hg、Cu、Pb 和 Zn 的显著富集。主成分分析表明,受经济工业活动影响的土壤重金属与对照样有明显不同的来源,特别是 Hg 和 Cd 代表的人为源。在重金属化学形态方面,三种工业活动均对生物有效性(0.72-24.27%)有影响,可能增加重金属在环境中的迁移活性。此外,基于总量和生物有效性的传统和改进评估均表明,中北部煤城和油气城附近的生态风险较低,而南部经济发达城市附近的生态风险较高,尤其是天水、宝鸡、岐山、咸阳、西安和铜川。相比之下,基于生物有效性的改进风险评估不仅可以从总量角度弥补传统风险评估的高估,还可以实现对重金属风险更合理、有效和先进的科学研究评估。本研究结果对黄河流域的生态保护和高质量发展具有重要意义。