Department of Psychology, University of Johannesburg.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):244-257. doi: 10.1177/17456916231182922. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
This article addresses a paradox between self-perceptions of psychology as a liberal, progressive, antiracist discipline and profession and the persistent criticisms of racism and calls for decolonization. It builds on the criticisms of epistemic exclusion and White centering, arguing that White supremacy is maintained by "conversational silencing" in which the focus on doing good psychology systematically draws attention away from the realities of racism and the operation of power. The process is illustrated by investigations of disciplinary discourse around non-Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic psychology and on stereotyping, racism, and prejudice reduction, which constitute the vanguard of liberal scholarship in the discipline. This progressive scholarship nurtures "White ignorance," an absence of belief about systemic racism that psychology plays a part in upholding.
本文探讨了心理学作为一门自由、进步、反种族主义的学科和专业,与人们对其持续存在的种族主义批评和去殖民化呼吁之间的悖论。它借鉴了对知识排斥和以白人为中心的批评,认为种族主义是通过“对话性沉默”来维持的,这种沉默将关注重点放在做好心理学上,从而有系统地将人们的注意力从种族主义的现实和权力运作上转移开。这一过程通过对非西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主心理学的学科话语以及刻板印象、种族主义和偏见减少的研究来加以说明,这些研究构成了学科中自由学术的先锋。这种进步学术培养了“白人的无知”,即对心理学在维护种族主义中所起作用的系统性种族主义缺乏信念。