Department of Cardiovascular, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Weihai, Shandong, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BeiJing Daxing District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Daxing, Beijing, China.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(2):2235057. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2235057.
The optimal drug management strategy for severe hypertension during pregnancy remains inconclusive. Some randomized controlled trials found that oral nifedipine was more effective than intravenous labetalol in hypertensive emergencies during pregnancy, while others found otherwise. As a result, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for hypertensive emergencies during pregnancy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials that compared oral nifedipine versus IV labetalol in hypertensive emergencies during pregnancy. 12 RCTs enrolling 1151 participants (573 in the labetalol group and 578 in the nifedipine group) were included in the meta-analysis. Patients who received oral nifedipine reached their target blood pressure more rapidly than those who received intravenous labetalol (MD 7.64, 95%CI 4.08-11.20, < .0001). The nifedipine group required fewer doses to achieve the target blood pressure (MD 0.62, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.88, < .00001). There were no meaningful differences on the maternal complications between the two groups, mainly including eclampsia (OR 1.51; 95% CI, 0.75-3.05; = .25), headache (OR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.52-1.44; = .57), nausea/vomiting (OR 1.50; 95% CI, 0.76-2.93; = .24), hypotension (OR 0.49; 95% CI, 0.12-1.99; = .32), dizziness (OR 2.01; 95% CI, 0.77-5.25; = .16), HELLP (OR 0.27; 95% CI, 0.05-1.64; = .16), palpitations (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.32-1.27; = .20), flushing (OR 0.77; 95%CI, 0.18-3.22; = .72). There were no significant difference in the neonatal complications, including NICU admission (OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.87-1.77; = .23), 5 min Apgar score < 7 (OR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82-1.39; = .63), neonatal deaths (OR 1.08; 95%CI, 0.66-1.76; = .77), FHR abnormality (OR 0.94; 95%CI, 0.47-1.88; = .86). In conclusion, oral nifedipine could achieve target blood pressure more rapidly and required fewer doses than intravenous labetalol in the management of hypertensive emergencies during pregnancy.
在妊娠期间严重高血压的最佳药物管理策略仍不确定。一些随机对照试验发现,在妊娠高血压急症中,口服硝苯地平比静脉注射拉贝洛尔更有效,而其他一些试验则发现并非如此。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估口服硝苯地平与静脉注射拉贝洛尔在妊娠高血压急症中的疗效。我们检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆中比较口服硝苯地平和静脉注射拉贝洛尔在妊娠高血压急症中的随机对照试验。共纳入 12 项 RCT,共 1151 名参与者(拉贝洛尔组 573 名,硝苯地平组 578 名)。与静脉注射拉贝洛尔相比,口服硝苯地平的患者更快达到目标血压(MD 7.64,95%CI 4.08-11.20,<.0001)。达到目标血压所需的硝苯地平剂量更少(MD 0.62,95%CI 0.36-0.88,<.00001)。两组间的产妇并发症无显著差异,主要包括子痫(OR 1.51;95%CI,0.75-3.05;=.25)、头痛(OR 0.86;95%CI,0.52-1.44;=.57)、恶心/呕吐(OR 1.50;95%CI,0.76-2.93;=.24)、低血压(OR 0.49;95%CI,0.12-1.99;=.32)、头晕(OR 2.01;95%CI,0.77-5.25;=.16)、HELLP(OR 0.27;95%CI,0.05-1.64;=.16)、心悸(OR 0.63;95%CI,0.32-1.27;=.20)、潮红(OR 0.77;95%CI,0.18-3.22;=.72)。新生儿并发症无显著差异,包括新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入住(OR 1.24;95%CI,0.87-1.77;=.23)、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7(OR 1.07;95%CI,0.82-1.39;=.63)、新生儿死亡(OR 1.08;95%CI,0.66-1.76;=.77)、胎心异常(OR 0.94;95%CI,0.47-1.88;=.86)。总之,在妊娠高血压急症的治疗中,口服硝苯地平比静脉注射拉贝洛尔能更快地达到目标血压,且所需剂量更少。