Nursing Science, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Transpl Int. 2023 Jul 10;36:11308. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11308. eCollection 2023.
After heart transplantation (HTx), non-adherence to immunosuppressants (IS) is associated with poor outcomes; however, intentional non-adherence (INA) is poorly understood regarding its international variability in prevalence, contributing factors and impact on outcomes. We investigated (1) the prevalence and international variability of INA, (2) patient-level correlates of INA, and (3) relation of INA with clinical outcomes. Secondary analysis of data from the BRIGHT study-an international multi-center, cross-sectional survey examining multi-level factors of adherence in 1,397 adult HTx recipients. INA during the implementation phase, i.e., drug holiday and dose alteration, was measured using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS). Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed with data retrieved through patient interview, patient self-report and in clinical records. INA prevalence was 3.3% ( = 46/1,397)-drug holidays: 1.7% ( = 24); dose alteration: 1.4% ( = 20); both: 0.1% ( = 2). University-level education (OR = 2.46, CI = 1.04-5.83), insurance not covering IS costs (OR = 2.21, CI = 1.01-4.87) and barriers (OR = 4.90, CI = 2.73-8.80) were significantly associated with INA; however, clinical outcomes were not. Compared to other single-center studies, this sample's INA prevalence was low. More than accessibility or financial concerns, our analyses identified patient-level barriers as INA drivers. Addressing patients' IS-related barriers, should decrease INA.
心脏移植(HTx)后,免疫抑制剂(IS)不依从与不良结局相关;然而,关于其国际变异性、患病率、影响因素和对结局的影响,故意不依从(INA)的情况了解甚少。我们调查了:(1)INA 的患病率和国际变异性,(2)患者水平的 INA 相关因素,(3)INA 与临床结局的关系。BRIGHT 研究的二次分析-一项国际多中心、横断面调查,研究了 1397 例成年 HTx 受者依从性的多层次因素。使用巴塞尔免疫抑制药物依从性评估量表(BAASIS)来测量实施阶段的 INA,即药物假期和剂量调整。通过患者访谈、患者自我报告和临床记录中检索到的数据进行描述性和推断性分析。INA 的患病率为 3.3%(=46/1397)-药物假期:1.7%(=24);剂量调整:1.4%(=20);两者都有:0.1%(=2)。大学教育水平(OR=2.46,CI=1.04-5.83)、保险不覆盖 IS 费用(OR=2.21,CI=1.01-4.87)和障碍(OR=4.90,CI=2.73-8.80)与 INA 显著相关;然而,临床结局并非如此。与其他单中心研究相比,该样本的 INA 患病率较低。我们的分析表明,患者水平的障碍是 INA 的驱动因素,而不仅仅是可及性或财务问题。解决患者的 IS 相关障碍,应该可以降低 INA。