研究指导：卫生专业人员能力的培养
Mentoring in research: development of competencies for health professionals.
作者信息
da Silva Souza Regina Claudia, Bersaneti Mariana Davies Ribeiro, Dos Santos Yamaguti Wellington Pereira, Baia Wania Regina Mollo
机构信息
Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
出版信息
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jul 26;22(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01411-9.
BACKGROUND
Mentoring programmes in health research are beneficial for both mentors and mentees and are essential for the development of the next generation of research leaders. This study describes the self-assessment of research skills in health professionals participating in a research mentoring programme and determines the correlation between the participants' self-assessment of research skills and professional characteristics.
METHOD
This was a quasi-experimental, time-series study conducted in a Brazilian tertiary hospital. Thirty-five health professionals holding a master's or PhD degree were included. The participants answered a survey in which they self-assessed their research skills distributed into eight domains, with one group responding before training and another group responding after training. The level of significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05).
RESULTS
Those who received training scored better in research skills related to two domains: critical analysis of the literature and identification of appropriate research methods (p = 0.0245).
CONCLUSION
Trained professionals performed better in the domains of critical thinking and knowledge and management of steps in the research process.
背景
健康研究中的指导计划对指导者和被指导者都有益，对于培养下一代研究领导者至关重要。本研究描述了参与研究指导计划的卫生专业人员对研究技能的自我评估，并确定参与者对研究技能的自我评估与专业特征之间的相关性。
方法
这是一项在巴西一家三级医院进行的准实验性时间序列研究。纳入了35名拥有硕士或博士学位的卫生专业人员。参与者回答了一项调查，在调查中他们对自己分布在八个领域的研究技能进行自我评估，一组在培训前回答，另一组在培训后回答。显著性水平设定为5%（p < 0.05）。
结果
接受培训的人员在与两个领域相关的研究技能方面得分更高：文献的批判性分析和适当研究方法的识别（p = 0.0245）。
结论
经过培训的专业人员在批判性思维以及研究过程中步骤的知识和管理领域表现更好。
Zotero 插件