Wagner Justin J, St Cyr Nikolas, Douen Aaron, Fogel Joshua, Trillo John
Department of Medicine South Brooklyn Health Brooklyn New York USA.
Department of Business Management Brooklyn New York USA.
JGH Open. 2023 Jul 10;7(7):464-469. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12905. eCollection 2023 Jul.
There is limited research on the use of histamine-H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for treating COVID-19. We compare clinical outcomes between patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receiving famotidine or pantoprazole.
This retrospective study included 2184 patients (famotidine: = 638, pantoprazole: = 727, nonuse: = 819) aged 18 years or older treated for COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. Patients who received both famotidine and pantoprazole treatments were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary outcome, namely all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes, namely mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding. The main predictor variable was the use of famotidine or pantoprazole. Covariates were demographics, chronic diseases, and symptoms.
As compared to nonuse, famotidine (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.44, < 0.001) and pantoprazole (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality. Comparison of famotidine and pantoprazole showed that the former had lower odds for all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI:0.45-0.95, < 0.05), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.58, < 0.001), vasopressor use (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48, < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.54, < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.29, < 0.001).
Famotidine is associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding as compared to pantoprazole in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of famotidine over pantoprazole for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Future research with a clinical trial would be beneficial to further support such use of famotidine.
关于使用组胺H2受体拮抗剂和质子泵抑制剂治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的研究有限。我们比较了因COVID-19住院并接受法莫替丁或泮托拉唑治疗的患者的临床结局。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年3月至2021年3月期间接受COVID-19治疗的18岁及以上患者2184例(法莫替丁组:n = 638,泮托拉唑组:n = 727,未用药组:n = 819)。排除同时接受法莫替丁和泮托拉唑治疗的患者。多因素逻辑回归用于主要结局,即全因死亡率,以及次要结局,即机械通气、血管活性药物使用、急性肾损伤和胃肠道出血。主要预测变量是法莫替丁或泮托拉唑的使用情况。协变量包括人口统计学特征、慢性病和症状。
与未用药相比,法莫替丁(比值比:0.30,95%置信区间:0.20 - 0.44,P < 0.001)和泮托拉唑(比值比:0.47,95%置信区间:0.33 - 0.66,P < 0.001)与全因死亡率较低显著相关。法莫替丁与泮托拉唑比较显示,前者全因死亡率较低(比值比:0.65,95%置信区间:0.45 - 0.95,P < 0.05),机械通气(比值比:0.38,95%置信区间:0.25 - 0.58,P < 0.001)、血管活性药物使用(比值比:0.33,95%置信区间:0.22 - 0.48,P < 0.001)、急性肾损伤(比值比:0.40,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.54,P < 0.001)及胃肠道出血(比值比:0.15,95%置信区间:0.08 - 0.29,P < 0.001)的发生率也较低。
在因COVID-19住院的患者中,与泮托拉唑相比,法莫替丁与全因死亡率、机械通气、血管活性药物使用、急性肾损伤和胃肠道出血发生率较低相关。我们建议临床医生在治疗住院COVID-19患者时考虑使用法莫替丁而非泮托拉唑。未来进行临床试验研究将有助于进一步支持法莫替丁的这种应用。