Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany; Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Sep;153:152-165. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
Clinical, behavioural, and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are highly variable and difficult to predict. We aimed to examine associations between cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength, morphometric posterior fossa parameters, and skin-cerebellum distance. As a secondary objective, field characteristics were compared between cephalic and extracephalic electrode configurations.
Electric field simulations of midline cerebellar tDCS (7 × 5 cm electrodes, current intensities of 2 mA) were performed on MRI-based head models from 37 healthy adults using buccinator, frontopolar, and lower neck reference electrodes. Average field strengths were determined in eight regions of interest (ROIs) covering the anterior and posterior vermis and cerebellar hemispheres. Besides skin-cerebellum distance, various angles were measured between posterior fossa structures. Multivariable linear regression models were used to identify predictors of field strength in different ROIs.
Skin-cerebellum distance and "pons angle" were independently associated with field strength in the anterior and posterior vermis. "Cerebellar angle" and skin-cerebellum distance affected field strength in anterior and posterior regions of the right cerebellar hemisphere. Field strengths in all examined cerebellar areas were highest in the frontopolar and lowest in the lower neck montage, while the opposite was found for field focality. The lower neck montage induced considerably less spreading toward anterior cerebellar regions compared with the buccinator and frontopolar montages, which resulted in a more evenly distributed field within the cerebellum.
In addition to skin-cerebellum distance, interindividual differences in posterior fossa morphometry, specifically pons and cerebellar angle, explain part of the variability in cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength. Furthermore, when targeting the midline cerebellum with tDCS, an extracephalic reference electrode is associated with lower field strengths and higher field focality than cephalic montages.
This study identifies two novel subject-specific anatomical factors that partly determine cerebellar tDCS-induced electric field strength and reveals differences in field characteristics between electrode montages.
小脑颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的临床、行为和神经生理效应高度可变且难以预测。我们旨在研究小脑 tDCS 诱导的电场强度、后颅窝形态参数和皮肤-小脑距离之间的相关性。作为次要目标,比较了颅外和颅外电极配置的场特征。
使用颊肌、额极和下颈部参考电极,对 37 名健康成年人的基于 MRI 的头部模型进行中线小脑 tDCS(7×5cm 电极,电流强度为 2mA)的电场模拟。在覆盖前、后蚓部和小脑半球的八个感兴趣区域(ROI)中确定平均场强。除了皮肤-小脑距离外,还测量了后颅窝结构之间的各种角度。多变量线性回归模型用于确定不同 ROI 中电场强度的预测因子。
皮肤-小脑距离和“脑桥角”与前、后蚓部的场强独立相关。“小脑角”和皮肤-小脑距离影响右小脑半球前、后区域的场强。在前、后蚓部和右小脑半球的所有检查区域中,场强最高的是额极,最低的是下颈部配置,而场焦点则相反。与颊肌和额极配置相比,下颈部配置引起的电场向小脑前部区域的扩散要小得多,从而导致小脑内的电场分布更加均匀。
除了皮肤-小脑距离外,后颅窝形态学的个体间差异,特别是脑桥和小脑角,部分解释了小脑 tDCS 诱导的电场强度的可变性。此外,当使用 tDCS 靶向中线小脑时,与颅外电极配置相比,颅外参考电极的场强较低,场焦点较高。
本研究确定了两个新的与个体相关的解剖学因素,它们部分决定了小脑 tDCS 诱导的电场强度,并揭示了电极配置之间的场特征差异。