Ouergui Ibrahim, Delleli Slaheddine, Messaoudi Hamdi, Bridge Craig Alan, Chtourou Hamdi, Franchini Emerson, Ardigò Luca Paolo
High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Jendouba, Tunisia.
Research Unit: Sport Sciences, Health and Movement, UR22JS01, University of Jendouba, El Kef, Tunisia.
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 12;14:1179309. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1179309. eCollection 2023.
The present study assessed the effects of conditioning activities, using different effort-to-pause ratios and rest intervals, on taekwondo physical performance. Twenty-one athletes (13 males and 8 females) (Mean ± SD; age = 20.4 ± 1.4 years) performed a control (CC) and twelve experimental conditions. Each condition contained a standard warm-up (i.e., CC: running at 9 km/h for 10 min) and conditioning activities comprising plyometrics P) or repeated high-intensity techniques (RT) using 1:6, 1:9 and self-selected rest (SSR) ratios, and two rest intervals (3 and 7 min). Athletes then performed a battery of fitness tests: countermovement jump (CMJ), taekwondo specific agility (TSAT), 10s and multiple frequency speed kick test (FSKT-10s and FSKT-mult, respectively). All of the preloads provided higher performance outputs compared to the control trial (all < 0.05). For CMJ, 1:6 ratio with 3 min induced lower values with RT compared to P ( = 0.037) and 1:9 ratio using 3 min induced higher values with RT compared to P ( = 0.027). Additionally, 1:6 ratio using 7 min induced higher values with RT compared to P ( = 0.016). For FSKT-10, 3 min using 1:6 induced higher values with P compared to RT, while RT induced higher values with 7 min using 1:6 ratio compared to P (both < 0.001). Moreover, 3 min using 1:9 ratio induced higher values with P compared to RT ( = 0.034), while RT induced higher values with 1:9 ratio using 7 min compared to P ( < 0.001). Finally, 3 min using SSR ratio induced higher values with RT compared to P ( = 0.034). Plyometrics and RT activities improved performance with plyometrics requiring shorter rest interval to induce potentiation effects compared to RT, which required longer interval.
本研究评估了使用不同用力与暂停比例及休息间隔的调节活动对跆拳道体能表现的影响。21名运动员(13名男性和8名女性)(平均值±标准差;年龄 = 20.4 ± 1.4岁)进行了一次对照(CC)和12种实验条件。每种条件都包含标准热身(即CC:以9公里/小时的速度跑步10分钟)以及调节活动,调节活动包括使用1:6、1:9和自选休息(SSR)比例的增强式训练(P)或重复高强度技术(RT),以及两种休息间隔(3分钟和7分钟)。运动员随后进行了一系列体能测试:反向纵跳(CMJ)、跆拳道专项敏捷性(TSAT)、10秒和多次频率速度踢测试(分别为FSKT - 10s和FSKT - mult)。与对照试验相比,所有预负荷都提供了更高的表现输出(所有P < 0.05)。对于CMJ,与P相比,RT在1:6比例且休息3分钟时诱导出较低的值(P = 0.037),而RT在1:9比例且休息3分钟时诱导出比P更高的值(P = 0.027)。此外,RT在1:6比例且休息7分钟时诱导出比P更高的值(P = 0.016)。对于FSKT - 10,P在1:6比例且休息3分钟时诱导出比RT更高的值,而RT在1:6比例且休息7分钟时诱导出比P更高的值(两者P < 0.001)。此外,P在1:9比例且休息3分钟时诱导出比RT更高的值(P = 0.034),而RT在1:9比例且休息7分钟时诱导出比P更高的值(P < 0.001)。最后,RT在SSR比例且休息3分钟时诱导出比P更高的值(P = 0.034)。增强式训练和RT活动都提高了表现,与需要更长间隔的RT相比,增强式训练需要更短的休息间隔来诱导增强效应。