Suppr超能文献

真相与偏见,左派与右派:用现实的新闻供应来检验意识形态不对称性。

Truth and Bias, Left and Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News Supply.

作者信息

Clemm von Hohenberg Bernhard

机构信息

Research Associate, Department of Computational Social Sciences, GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2023 Apr 29;87(2):267-292. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad013. eCollection 2023 Summer.

Abstract

The debate around "fake news" has raised the question of whether liberals and conservatives differ, first, in their ability to discern true from false information, and second, in their tendency to give more credit to information that is ideologically congruent. Typical designs to measure these asymmetries select, often arbitrarily, a small set of news items as experimental stimuli without clear reference to a "population of information." This pre-registered study takes an alternative approach by, first, conceptualizing estimands in relation to all political news. Second, to represent this target population, it uses a set of 80 randomly sampled items from a large collection of articles from Google News and three fact-checking sites. In a subsequent survey, a quota sample of US participants (n = 1,393) indicate whether they believe the news items to be true. Conservatives are less truth-discerning than liberals, but also less affected by the congruence of news.

摘要

围绕“假新闻”的争论引发了这样一个问题:自由派和保守派是否存在差异,首先,在辨别真假信息的能力上;其次,在更倾向于相信与自身意识形态相符的信息方面。衡量这些不对称性的典型设计通常是随意挑选一小部分新闻条目作为实验刺激物,而没有明确参照“信息总体”。这项预先注册的研究采用了另一种方法,首先,将估计量与所有政治新闻联系起来进行概念化。其次,为了代表这个目标总体,它从谷歌新闻和三个事实核查网站的大量文章中随机抽取了一组80个条目。在随后的一项调查中,美国参与者的配额样本(n = 1393)表明他们是否认为这些新闻条目是真实的。保守派比自由派更不善于辨别真相,但也较少受到新闻一致性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd47/10371040/2ffca8f425c1/nfad013f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验