Suppr超能文献

改善同辈在线论坛(iPOF):对同辈在线心理健康论坛进行实际评估的方案,以为实践和政策提供信息。

Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy.

机构信息

Spectrum Centre, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 30;13(7):e075142. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peer online mental health forums are commonly used and offer accessible support. Positive and negative impacts have been reported by forum members and moderators, but it is unclear why these impacts occur, for whom and in which forums. This multiple method realist study explores underlying mechanisms to understand how forums work for different people. The findings will inform codesign of best practice guidance and policy tools to enhance the uptake and effectiveness of peer online mental health forums.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

In workstream 1, we will conduct a realist synthesis, based on existing literature and interviews with approximately 20 stakeholders, to generate initial programme theories about the impacts of forums on members and moderators and mechanisms driving these. Initial theories that are relevant for forum design and implementation will be prioritised for testing in workstream 2.Workstream 2 is a multiple case study design with mixed methods with several online mental health forums differing in contextual features. Quantitative surveys of forum members, qualitative interviews and Corpus-based Discourse Analysis and Natural Language Processing of forum posts will be used to test and refine programme theories. Final programme theories will be developed through novel triangulation of the data.Workstream 3 will run alongside workstreams 1 and 2. Key stakeholders from participating forums, including members and moderators, will be recruited to a Codesign group. They will inform the study design and materials, refine and prioritise theories, and codesign best policy and practice guidance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by Solihull Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 314029). Findings will be reported in accordance with RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidelines, published as open access and shared widely, along with codesigned tools.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN 62469166; the protocol for the realist synthesis in workstream one is prospectively registered at PROSPERO CRD42022352528.

摘要

介绍

同伴在线心理健康论坛通常被使用,并提供可及的支持。论坛成员和版主报告了积极和消极的影响,但不清楚为什么这些影响会发生,对谁发生,以及在哪些论坛发生。本多重方法现实主义研究旨在探索潜在机制,以了解论坛如何为不同的人发挥作用。研究结果将为最佳实践指南和政策工具的共同设计提供信息,以提高同伴在线心理健康论坛的采用率和有效性。

方法和分析

在工作流程 1 中,我们将基于现有文献和对大约 20 名利益相关者的访谈,进行真实主义综合,以生成关于论坛对成员和版主的影响以及驱动这些影响的机制的初始方案理论。将优先考虑与论坛设计和实施相关的初始理论,以便在工作流程 2 中进行测试。工作流程 2 是一个具有混合方法的多案例研究设计,涉及几个在线心理健康论坛,这些论坛在背景特征上存在差异。将对论坛成员进行定量调查、对论坛成员进行定性访谈以及对论坛帖子进行基于语料库的话语分析和自然语言处理,以测试和完善方案理论。最终的方案理论将通过数据的新颖三角测量法来开发。工作流程 3 将与工作流程 1 和 2 同时进行。来自参与论坛的主要利益相关者,包括成员和版主,将被招募到一个共同设计小组中。他们将为研究设计和材料提供信息,完善和优先考虑理论,并共同设计最佳政策和实践指南。

伦理和传播

索利赫尔研究伦理委员会(IRAS 314029)已批准伦理。将按照 RAMESES(现实主义和元叙述证据综合:不断发展的标准)指南报告研究结果,以开放获取的形式发表,并广泛分享,同时还将分享共同设计的工具。

试验注册编号

ISRCTN62469166;工作流程 1 中的真实主义综合的方案在 PROSPERO CRD42022352528 中进行了前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6954/10387651/ce01b5b236da/bmjopen-2023-075142f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验