Turner-Zwinkels Felicity M, Brandt Mark J
Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Aug 3;51(1):1461672231189015. doi: 10.1177/01461672231189015.
We investigate the relationship between attitude instability and both party identity strength and ideology strength. We test the explorative hypotheses that higher party identity strength (H1) and ideology strength (H2) predict more attitude stability using intensive longitudinal data collected in the United States every 2 weeks over 1 year (Study 1, = 552) and in the Netherlands over 6 months (Study 2, = 1,670). We found mixed support for H1: In the United States, there was no association between party identity strength and attitude stability. In the Netherlands, people with stronger party identity had more stable attitudes. We found stronger support for H2: Individuals with a stronger ideology than average had more stable attitudes in the United States and the Netherlands. The context-dependent nature of relations is discussed.
我们研究了态度不稳定性与党派认同强度和意识形态强度之间的关系。我们使用在美国一年内每两周收集一次的密集纵向数据(研究1,n = 552)以及在荷兰六个月内收集的数据(研究2,n = 1,670),检验了探索性假设:较高的党派认同强度(H1)和意识形态强度(H2)预示着更高的态度稳定性。我们发现对H1的支持不一:在美国,党派认同强度与态度稳定性之间没有关联。在荷兰,党派认同较强的人态度更稳定。我们发现对H2有更强的支持:在美国和荷兰,意识形态比平均水平更强的个体态度更稳定。本文讨论了这些关系的情境依赖性。