From the College of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changqing District, Jinan City, China.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 1;103(2):149-157. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002320. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
The aims of the study are to systematically evaluate the effect of body weight support training on lower extremity motor function(s) in patients with spinal cord injury and to compare the effect differences among three body weight support training methods.
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBM, China Scientific Journal, and Wan Fang databases were searched until December 31, 2022. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and ADDIS 1.16.8.
Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving 864 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that body weight support training could improve lower extremity motor scores according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury standard (mean difference = 6.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.96-8.80, P < 0.05), walking speed (standard mean difference = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.52-1.02, P < 0.05), and modified Barthel Index scores (mean difference = 9.85, 95% confidence interval = 8.39-11.30, P < 0.05). The network meta-analysis showed no significant difference among the three body weight support training methods for improving lower extremity motor scores in patients with spinal cord injury. The best probability ranking of the body weight support training methods for improving lower extremity motor scores in patients with spinal cord injury was robot-assisted gait training ( P = 0.60), followed by aquatic exercise ( P = 0.21) and body weight support training ( P = 0.19).
Body weight support training can improve lower extremity motor score in patients with spinal cord injury. No significant difference was observed among the three body weight support training methods, but robot-assisted gait training may produce the best effect.
本研究旨在系统评价减重支持训练对脊髓损伤患者下肢运动功能的影响,并比较三种减重支持训练方法的效果差异。
检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国科学引文数据库和万方数据库,检索时间截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日。采用 RevMan 5.4 和 ADDIS 1.16.8 进行 Meta 分析和网络 Meta 分析。
纳入 19 项随机对照试验,共 864 例患者。Meta 分析结果显示,减重支持训练可改善脊髓损伤患者的下肢运动评分(根据国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准,均数差=6.38,95%置信区间=3.96-8.80,P<0.05)、步行速度(标准均数差=0.77,95%置信区间=0.52-1.02,P<0.05)和改良巴氏指数评分(均数差=9.85,95%置信区间=8.39-11.30,P<0.05)。网络 Meta 分析结果显示,三种减重支持训练方法对脊髓损伤患者下肢运动评分的改善效果无显著差异。三种减重支持训练方法改善脊髓损伤患者下肢运动评分的最佳概率排序为机器人辅助步态训练(P=0.60)、水中运动(P=0.21)和减重支持训练(P=0.19)。
减重支持训练可改善脊髓损伤患者的下肢运动功能,三种减重支持训练方法的效果无显著差异,但机器人辅助步态训练可能效果最佳。