Sean Dickson, West Health Policy Center, Washington, D.C.
Nico Gabriel, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Aug;42(8):1062-1070. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00250.
Previous research has demonstrated that the introduction of a new brand-name pharmaceutical competitor does not lower list prices for existing competitive therapies. However, no study has systematically evaluated the impact of new therapeutic competition on net prices of pharmaceutical products. We identified new therapies approved during the period 2013-17 that were competitors for existing treatments. We used a novel peer-reviewed algorithm to estimate the net prices of existing therapies. We implemented regression models to estimate changes in these net prices after the approval of the new therapeutic competition during the period 2011-19. Across twelve therapeutic classes with new drug entrants in 2013-17, the introduction of new therapeutic competition was associated with a 4.2 percent decrease in annual net price growth. The introduction of new brand-name therapies in twelve therapeutic classes reduced net commercial spending on existing therapies by $10.4 billion-an 18.5 percent reduction in projected spending absent therapeutic competition. Our findings demonstrate that new therapeutic competition allows pharmacy benefit managers to use formulary management to decrease net prices and reduce drug spending, contrary to observed trends in list price increases.
先前的研究表明,引入新的名牌药品竞争并不会降低现有竞争疗法的标价。然而,尚无研究系统评估新的治疗竞争对药品净价的影响。我们确定了 2013 年至 17 年期间获批的新疗法,这些疗法是现有疗法的竞争对手。我们使用一种新颖的同行评审算法来估算现有疗法的净价。我们实施回归模型来估算 2011 年至 19 年期间新治疗竞争获批后这些净价的变化。在 2013 年至 17 年有新药进入的十二个治疗类别中,新治疗竞争的引入与每年净价增长率下降 4.2%相关。十二个治疗类别中引入新的名牌疗法使现有疗法的净商业支出减少了 104 亿美元——如果没有治疗竞争,预计支出将减少 18.5%。我们的研究结果表明,新的治疗竞争使药品福利管理机构能够利用处方管理来降低净价并减少药物支出,这与标价上涨的观察趋势相反。