Schaepkens Sven P C, de la Croix Anne, Veen Mario
Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Research in Education, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Med Educ. 2024 Mar;58(3):318-326. doi: 10.1111/medu.15183. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
Learners in medical education generally perceive that reflection is important, but they also find that reflection is not always valuable or practically applicable. We address the gap between the potential benefits of reflection and its practical implementation in medical education. We examined the perspective of Dutch GP registrars who (must) reflect for their GP specialty training to understand their participant perspective on reflection. Our aim is stimulating alignment between reflective activities that occur in a medical curriculum and the ideals of reflection as a valuable educational activity.
We conducted, video-recorded and transcribed seven focus group sessions with GP registrars in 2021 across two Dutch GP educational programmes. We used discursive psychology to analyse the focus group data by focusing on 'assessments of reflection'. We analysed their discursive features (how something was said) and content features (what was said) and related these to each other to understand how GP registrars construct reflection.
Participants constructed reflection with nuance; they combined negative and positive assessments that displayed varied orientations to reflection. First, their combined assessments showed complex orientations to norms and experiences with reflecting in practice and that these are not simply negative or positive. Second, GP registrars constructed reflection as a negotiable topic and showed how reflection and its value can be variably understood. Third, through combined assessments, they displayed an orientation to the integration of reflection with other educational tasks, which impacts its value.
Generally, GP registrars speak positively about reflection, but the value of reflection partly depends on its proper integration with other educational tasks. When meaningful integration fails, activities to stimulate reflection can overshoot their own goal and hamper learner motivation to reflect. Developing a healthy 'reflection culture' could mitigate some challenges. Therein, reflection is treated as important while learners also have adequate autonomy.
医学教育中的学习者普遍认为反思很重要,但他们也发现反思并不总是有价值或实际可行的。我们探讨了反思的潜在益处与其在医学教育中的实际应用之间的差距。我们研究了荷兰全科医生住院医师的观点,他们(必须)为其全科医生专科培训进行反思,以了解他们对反思的参与视角。我们的目标是促进医学课程中发生的反思活动与作为一种有价值的教育活动的反思理想之间的一致性。
2021年,我们在荷兰的两个全科医生教育项目中,对全科医生住院医师进行了七次焦点小组讨论,并进行了视频录制和转录。我们运用话语心理学,通过关注“反思评估”来分析焦点小组数据。我们分析了其话语特征(某事是如何被表述的)和内容特征(说了什么),并将两者相互关联,以了解全科医生住院医师如何构建反思。
参与者对反思的构建细致入微;他们将负面和正面评估结合起来,展示了对反思的不同取向。首先,他们的综合评估显示出对实践反思的规范和经验的复杂取向,而且这些并非简单的负面或正面。其次,全科医生住院医师将反思构建为一个可协商的话题,并展示了反思及其价值如何能被不同地理解。第三,通过综合评估,他们展示了将反思与其他教育任务整合的取向,这影响了反思的价值。
总体而言,全科医生住院医师对反思持积极态度,但反思的价值部分取决于它与其他教育任务的恰当整合。当有意义的整合失败时,促进反思的活动可能会适得其反,阻碍学习者反思的动力。发展一种健康的“反思文化”可以减轻一些挑战。在这种文化中,反思被视为重要的,同时学习者也有足够的自主性。