Suppr超能文献

精神卫生领域巴西背景下的《提供者调查》的心理测量学特性:一项验证研究。

Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.

机构信息

MSc. Nurse and Professor, Bachelor in Nursing, Faculdade Prominas, Montes Claros (MG), Brazil.

PhD. Nurse and Full Professor, Department of Nursing, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (UNIMONTES), Montes Claros (MG), Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2023 Aug 4;142(2):e2022444. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

METHODS

The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.

RESULTS

A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.

CONCLUSIONS

The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.

摘要

背景

准确确定与工具的有效性和可靠性测量相关的方面,可以更大程度地确保结果的质量。

目的

分析巴西心理健康服务背景下《提供者调查》的心理测量学特性。

设计和设置

该工具验证研究在巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州蒙蒂斯克拉鲁斯市进行。

方法

采用共识标准选择健康测量工具清单对验证研究进行分析,以评估其有效性和可靠性。

结果

一个由专家评审组成的委员会进行了内容验证,之后计算了内容效度指数。通过使用 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 检验标准和 Bartlett 的球形检验进行探索性因子分析,进行了结构有效性验证。使用重测信度验证了可靠性。统计检验的显著性水平设为 5%(P<0.05)。最终的工具包括 54 个问题。内容效度指数为 97%。探索性因子分析确定了 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 指数为 0.901,Bartlett 的球形检验 P<0.001。我们获得了 0.95 的 Cronbach 的 alpha 系数和 0.849 的组内相关系数。

结论

翻译成葡萄牙语的《提供者调查》被命名为《精神健康恢复工作评估工具》。它具有足够的心理测量学特性,可以评估与精神社会护理网络使用者恢复相关的工作实践。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.
Sao Paulo Med J. 2023 Aug 4;142(2):e2022444. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623. eCollection 2023.
3
Validation of the Family Health Behavior Scale for the Brazilian population.
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Jan-Feb;98(1):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 May 6.
4
A new comprehensive oral health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 5;21(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01795-7.
9
Validation and reliability of the scale Self-efficacy and their child's level of asthma control.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Mar-Apr;71(2):406-412. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0528.
10
[Psychometric properties of the Internet Addiction Test in students in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais State, Brazil].
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 May 17;37(5):e00212619. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00212619. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Measures of Workplace Inclusion: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Methodology.
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Sep;30(3):420-454. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09872-4.
2
Mental health policy in Brazil: what's at stake in the changes currently under way.
Cad Saude Publica. 2019 Oct 31;35(11):e00129519. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00129519. eCollection 2019.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the patient perspective on care and rehabilitation scale in geriatric patients.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar-Apr;81:84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
4
Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity.
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):649-659. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
5
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
6
Provider perspectives on employment for people with serious mental illness.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;63(7):632-640. doi: 10.1177/0020764017725769. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
8
Heterogeneity and the effect of mental health parity mandates on the labor market.
J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
9
[Recovery: systematic review of a concept].
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Jan;20(1):125-36. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014201.04662013.
10
[Construction and validation of an instrument to assess the Reception with Risk Rating].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2012 Sep-Oct;65(5):751-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672012000500006.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验