Dev World Bioeth. 2024 Sep;24(3):207-216. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12421. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Predatory journals and conferences are an emerging problem in scientific literature as they have financial motives, without guaranteeing scientific quality and exposure. The main objective of the ASGLOS project is to investigate the predatory e-email characteristics, management, and possible consequences and to analyse the extent of the current problem at each academic level. To collect the personal experiences of physicians' mailboxes on predatory publishing, a Google Form® survey was designed and disseminated from September 2021 to April 2022. A total of 978 responses were analysed from 58 countries around the world. A total of 64.8% of participants indicated the need for 3 or fewer emails to acquire a criticality view in distinguishing a real invitation from a spam, while 11.5% still have doubt regardless of how many emails they get. The AGLOS Study clearly highlights the problem of academic e-mail spam by predatory journals and conferences. Our findings signify the importance of providing academic career-oriented advice and organising training sessions to increase awareness of predatory publishing for those conducting scientific research.
掠夺性期刊和会议是科学文献中一个新出现的问题,因为它们有经济动机,却不能保证科学质量和曝光率。ASGLOS 项目的主要目标是调查掠夺性电子邮件的特征、管理以及可能的后果,并分析每个学术层面当前问题的严重程度。为了收集医生邮箱中关于掠夺性出版的个人经验,我们设计了一个谷歌表单调查,并于 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月进行了分发。共收到来自全球 58 个国家的 978 份回复。共有 64.8%的参与者表示,需要 3 封或更少的电子邮件才能获得区分真实邀请和垃圾邮件的关键观点,而 11.5%的人无论收到多少电子邮件仍然存在疑问。AGLOS 研究清楚地突出了掠夺性期刊和会议对学术电子邮件垃圾邮件的问题。我们的研究结果表明,为从事科学研究的人提供以学术职业为导向的建议和组织培训课程,提高对掠夺性出版的认识非常重要。