Hudson Mark J, Nakagome Shigeki, Whitman John B
Eurasia3angle Research Group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische straße 10, 07745 Jena, Germany.
School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, 150-162 Pearse Street, Dublin, Ireland.
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Feb 24;2:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.6. eCollection 2020.
The population history of Japan has been one of the most intensively studied anthropological questions anywhere in the world, with a huge literature dating back to the nineteenth century and before. A growing consensus over the 1980s that the modern Japanese comprise an admixture of a Neolithic population with Bronze Age migrants from the Korean peninsula was crystallised in Kazurō Hanihara's influential 'dual structure hypothesis' published in 1991. Here, we use recent research in biological anthropology, historical linguistics and archaeology to evaluate this hypothesis after three decades. Although the major assumptions of Hanihara's model have been supported by recent work, we discuss areas where new findings have led to a re-evaluation of aspects of the hypothesis and emphasise the need for further research in key areas including ancient DNA and archaeology.
日本的人口历史一直是世界上研究最为深入的人类学问题之一,相关文献极为丰富,可追溯至19世纪乃至更早。20世纪80年代,一种越来越多的人认同的观点逐渐形成,即现代日本人是新石器时代人口与来自朝鲜半岛的青铜时代移民混合的结果。这一观点在1991年Kazurō Hanihara发表的有影响力的“双重结构假说”中得以明确阐述。在此,我们运用生物人类学、历史语言学和考古学领域的最新研究成果,在三十年后对这一假说进行评估。尽管Hanihara模型的主要假设已得到近期研究的支持,但我们也讨论了一些新发现促使对该假说某些方面进行重新评估的领域,并强调在包括古代DNA和考古学等关键领域开展进一步研究的必要性。