Tran N-Han, Waring Timothy, Atmaca Silke, Beheim Bret A
Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
School of Economics, University of Maine, Orono, USA.
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 1;3:e23. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.14. eCollection 2021.
From an evolutionary perspective, art presents many puzzles. Humans invest substantial effort in generating apparently useless displays that include artworks. These vary greatly from ordinary to intricate. From the perspective of signalling theory, these investments in highly complex artistic designs can reflect information about individuals and their social standing. Using a large corpus of art from South India ( = 3139 from 192 women), we test a number of hypotheses about the ways in which social stratification and individual differences affect the complexity of artistic designs. Consistent with evolutionary signalling theories of constrained optimisation, we find that art tends to occupy a 'sweet spot' at which artistic complexity, as measured by Shannon information entropy, remains relatively constant from small to large drawings. This stability is maintained through an observable, apparently unconscious trade-off between two standard information-theoretic measures: richness and evenness. Although these drawings arise in a highly stratified, caste-based society, we do not find strong evidence that artistic complexity is influenced by the caste boundaries of Indian society. Rather, the trade-off is likely due to individual-level aesthetic preferences and differences in skill, dedication and time, as well as the fundamental constraints of human cognition and memory.
从进化的角度来看,艺术呈现出许多谜题。人类投入大量精力去创作包括艺术品在内的看似无用的展示品。这些展示品从普通到复杂各不相同。从信号理论的角度来看,对高度复杂的艺术设计的这些投入可以反映有关个人及其社会地位的信息。我们使用来自印度南部的大量艺术作品集(192名女性的3139件作品),检验了一些关于社会分层和个体差异如何影响艺术设计复杂性的假设。与约束优化的进化信号理论一致,我们发现艺术往往处于一个“甜蜜点”,即从小幅画作到大幅画作,用香农信息熵衡量的艺术复杂性保持相对恒定。这种稳定性是通过两种标准信息论度量——丰富度和均匀度之间可观察到的、明显无意识的权衡来维持的。尽管这些画作产生于一个高度分层的、以种姓为基础的社会,但我们没有发现有力证据表明艺术复杂性受印度社会种姓界限的影响。相反,这种权衡可能是由于个人层面的审美偏好、技能、投入程度和时间的差异,以及人类认知和记忆的基本限制。