Mowbray Jessica L, Moreno Gabriela, Albers Christiaan G M, Poon Peter
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Jul 2;1(4):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.05.003. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Acromioclavicular (AC) horizontal instability is a problem affecting not only young athletic patients after a trauma to the AC joint but also older patients who have undergone distal clavicle resection. It may cause pain and poor functional outcomes unless the reconstruction technique specifically addresses the horizontal instability of the clavicle, in addition to the well-known superior instability.
Three cadaveric specimens underwent dissection of the AC joint capsule to determine the superior attachments of the AC joint capsule. These shoulders subsequently underwent distal clavicle resection and were loaded to a 7-kg weight in the horizontal plane. The horizontal displacement of the clavicle was measured and resection continued to the point of horizontal instability of the clavicle. Thereafter, the reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction technique was performed and recreation of horizontal stability assessed. Utilization of the reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer in two clinical cases will also be presented.
The AC joint capsule is continuous with trapezius and deltoid insertions. The average distance between the articular surface and insertion of the capsule on the clavicle is 10 mm and on the acromion is 14.8 mm. Horizontal clavicular translation increased from 2.3 mm when intact to 3.3 mm with capsular transection, 8.7 mm with 5 mm clavicle resection, and finally 15 mm with a 10-mm clavicle resection. Horizontal instability of the clavicle was demonstrated with a 10-mm clavicle resection.
Horizontal instability of the clavicle is evident with distal clavicle resection of greater than 10 mm. A reverse coracoacromial ligament transfer may be a reasonable technique to address horizontal stability of the clavicle during AC joint reconstruction in the context of painful instability.
肩锁关节(AC)水平不稳定不仅是年轻运动员在AC关节创伤后面临的问题,也是接受锁骨远端切除术的老年患者所面临的问题。除非重建技术除了解决众所周知的向上不稳定问题外,还专门解决锁骨的水平不稳定问题,否则可能会导致疼痛和功能预后不良。
对三个尸体标本进行肩锁关节囊解剖,以确定肩锁关节囊的上方附着点。随后对这些肩部进行锁骨远端切除术,并在水平面上加载7千克的重量。测量锁骨的水平位移,并继续切除直至锁骨出现水平不稳定。此后,进行反向喙肩韧带重建技术,并评估水平稳定性的恢复情况。还将介绍在两个临床病例中使用反向喙肩韧带转移的情况。
肩锁关节囊与斜方肌和三角肌附着处连续。关节面与锁骨上囊的插入点之间的平均距离为10毫米,与肩峰上的插入点之间的平均距离为14.8毫米。锁骨的水平平移从完整时的2.3毫米增加到关节囊横断时的3.3毫米,5毫米锁骨切除时为8.7毫米,最后10毫米锁骨切除时为15毫米。10毫米锁骨切除显示出锁骨的水平不稳定。
锁骨远端切除超过10毫米时,锁骨的水平不稳定明显。在疼痛性不稳定的情况下,反向喙肩韧带转移可能是在肩锁关节重建过程中解决锁骨水平稳定性的合理技术。