Suppr超能文献

局部麻醉注射套件对经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛缓解及术后恢复的影响

Effect of a Local Anesthetic Injection Kit on Pain Relief and Postoperative Recovery After Transumbilical Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Yang Na, Tao Qing-Yu, Niu Jing-Yi, Sun Hao, He Yan, Hou Yong-Bo, Luo Hong, Zhang Zhi, Yu Jun-Ma

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Hefei), Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2023 Aug 11;16:2791-2801. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S422454. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to explore whether incisional infiltration using a local anesthetic injection kit could better relieve postoperative pain and enhance the quality of recovery compared with ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) or conventional local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients undergoing SILC with American Society of Anesthesiology functional status scores of I-II were randomized into the rectus sheath block group (RSB group), conventional local wound infiltration group (LAI-I group) and incisional infiltration using a local anesthetic injection kit group (LAI-II group). The primary outcomes were the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) demand frequency within 48 hours after the operation and postoperative pain measured by a visual analog scale (VAS) at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the total procedure times, cumulative consumption of anesthetic drugs, duration of surgery, duration and awaking time of anesthesia, early recovery indicator and side effects.

RESULTS

The PCIA demand frequency in LAI-II group was significantly lower compared with patients in the RSB and LAI-I group (both < 0.001). Moreover, the total procedure times in LAI-I and LAI-II group was significantly shorter than that in the RSB group ( < 0.001, respectively), but it was comparable between LAI-I and LAI-II group ( = 0.471). Though lower at 2h and 4h postoperative in LAI-II group, pain scores at each time point had no statistical differences among three groups. There were no significant differences among three groups for other outcomes as well.

CONCLUSION

The effect of ultrasound-guided RSB and conventional local anesthetic infiltration in SILC patients were found to be similar in terms of relieving postoperative pain and promoting recovery. Incisional infiltration using a local anesthetic injection kit can significantly reduce the demand frequency of PCIA, which serves as a rescue analgesic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与超声引导下腹直肌鞘阻滞(RSB)或传统局部麻醉药浸润相比,使用局部麻醉注射套件进行切口浸润是否能更好地缓解经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)患者的术后疼痛并提高恢复质量。

患者与方法

总共60例美国麻醉医师协会功能状态评分为I-II级的接受SILC的患者被随机分为腹直肌鞘阻滞组(RSB组)、传统局部伤口浸润组(LAI-I组)和使用局部麻醉注射套件进行切口浸润组(LAI-II组)。主要结局指标为术后48小时内患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)的需求频率,以及术后2小时、4小时、8小时、24小时和48小时采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量的术后疼痛。次要结局指标为总手术时间、麻醉药物累计消耗量、手术时长、麻醉持续时间和苏醒时间、早期恢复指标及副作用。

结果

LAI-II组的PCIA需求频率显著低于RSB组和LAI-I组患者(均P<0.001)。此外,LAI-I组和LAI-II组的总手术时间显著短于RSB组(分别为P<0.001),但LAI-I组和LAI-II组之间相当(P=0.471)。虽然LAI-II组术后2小时和4小时时疼痛评分较低,但三个组在各时间点的疼痛评分无统计学差异。三组在其他结局指标方面也无显著差异。

结论

超声引导下RSB和传统局部麻醉药浸润在缓解SILC患者术后疼痛和促进恢复方面效果相似。使用局部麻醉注射套件进行切口浸润可显著降低PCIA作为补救性镇痛的需求频率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c513/10426734/ff6d1e3fe13d/JPR-16-2791-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验