Suppr超能文献

未能控制 2 型糖尿病女性的常规心血管风险因素可能解释了其死亡率更高的原因。

Failure to control conventional cardiovascular risk factors in women with type 2 diabetes might explain worse mortality.

机构信息

Res Consortium, Andover, Hampshire, UK.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023 Nov;39(8):e3695. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3695. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The standardised mortality rate (SMR) for people with diabetes in England is 1.5-1.7, with differences in outcomes between sexes. There has been little work examining the factors that could have an impact on this or on what may determine sex differences in outcome.

METHODS

Data were extracted for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Salford (England) in 2010 for the years up to 2020, including any deaths recorded. Expected deaths were calculated from annual Office of National Statistics mortality rate and life expectancy by age and gender, adjusted for the local Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). This provided the SMR deprivation (SMRd), and life expectancy years lost per death (LEYLD). The effects of treatment type, and clinical features on SMRd relative to sex were examined by univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Data from n = 11,806 (F = 5184; M = 6622) patients were included. Of these, n = 5540 were newly diagnosed and n = 3921 died (F = 1841; M = 2080). In total, n = 78,930 patient years. The expected deaths numbered n = 2596 (adjusted for age, sex, and IMD). Excess deaths were n = 1325 (F = 689; M = 636). Life expectancy years lost (LEYL) 18,989 (F = 9714; M = 9275). SMRd 1.51 (F = 1.60; M = 1.44) and LEYLD 4.84 years (F = 5.28; M = 4.46). The impact of risk factors was not different by sex. However, women had higher prevalence of % diagnosed >65 years of age; % last eGFR <60 mLs/min/1.73 m , and lower prevalence of % prescribed ACE-inhibitor/ARB, DPP4-inhibitor and SGLT2-inhibitor. Applying the male prevalence rate to the female population and expected mortality suggested n = 437 (55%) of excess T2D female deaths were attributed to sex difference in the prevalence of these risk and protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in women with T2DM are worse than in men, contributed to by greater prevalence of adverse factors and less prescribing of cardioprotective medication.

摘要

简介

英格兰糖尿病患者的标准化死亡率(SMR)为 1.5-1.7,男女之间的预后存在差异。目前,很少有研究探讨可能影响这一点的因素,或者决定预后性别差异的因素。

方法

从 2010 年到 2020 年,提取了英格兰索尔福德(Salford)2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的数据,包括记录的所有死亡人数。预期死亡人数是根据年度国家统计局死亡率和按年龄和性别划分的预期寿命计算得出的,同时还考虑了当地的多重剥夺指数(IMD)。这提供了相对性别而言的标准化死亡率剥夺(SMRd)和每例死亡丧失的预期寿命年数(LEYLD)。通过单变量和多变量分析,研究了治疗类型和临床特征对 SMRd 的影响。

结果

共纳入 n=11806 例患者(F=5184;M=6622),其中 n=5540 例为新诊断患者,n=3921 例死亡(F=1841;M=2080)。总共有 n=78930 人年。预期死亡人数为 n=2596 人(按年龄、性别和 IMD 调整)。超额死亡人数为 n=1325 人(F=689;M=636)。丧失的预期寿命年数(LEYL)为 18989 年(F=9714;M=9275)。SMRd 为 1.51(F=1.60;M=1.44),LEYLD 为 4.84 年(F=5.28;M=4.46)。危险因素的影响在性别之间没有差异。然而,女性 %诊断年龄 >65 岁的比例较高;%最后一次 eGFR <60 mLs/min/1.73 m 的比例较高,而 %服用 ACE 抑制剂/ARB、DPP4 抑制剂和 SGLT2 抑制剂的比例较低。如果将男性的患病率应用于女性人群,并根据预期死亡率进行预测,则表明女性 2 型糖尿病患者中 n=437(55%)的超额死亡归因于这些风险和保护因素的患病率性别差异。

结论

女性 2 型糖尿病患者的预后比男性差,这归因于不良因素的患病率更高,以及心脏保护药物的使用率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验