Baghele Om Nemichand, Bezalwar Khushbu Vilasrao, Bhandari Vishnudas Dwarakadas, Ugale Gauri Mahesh
Department of Periodontology, Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):407-415. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_563_22. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
There are very limited data on the postsurgical formation of a mucogingival junction (MGJ) on teeth without its clinical detectability.
The purpose of this study was to assess the formation and stability of MGJ on teeth without clinically detectable MGJ secondary to vestibular extension procedures for multiple adjacent teeth evaluated 6 months postoperatively.
This prospective interventional single-arm clinical study was conducted in the department of Periodontology, which was approved by the institutional ethical committee, MUHS, Nashik, and registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India.
This trial included 22 participants aged between 18 and 50 years of either gender, including teeth without clinically detectable MGJ along with adjacent teeth having detectable MGJs. The following clinical parameters were taken at baseline, presurgical, immediate postsurgical, 1-month and 6-month follow-ups: plaque index, gingival index, and position of MGJ. gingival margin level, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva, width of attached gingiva, clinical attachment level, and vestibular depth.
Descriptive statistics included mean, median, mode, etc., and the inferential statistics done were analysis of variance along with Tukey and independent sample tests.
Apical shift of MGJ was observed from baseline to 6 months secondary to split-full-split repositioning MGJ with vestibular extension procedure, which was statistically significant ( < 0.05). The formation of MGJ was delineated by clinical and biochemical methods at sites with nondetectable MGJ. The coronal migration of MGJ at 6 months as compared to 1 month was not statistically significant ( > 0.05). The MGJ remained stable at 6 months postoperatively at detectable and nondetectable sites.
Within the limitations of this study, we can conclude that there is a definite formation of MGJ in participants without clinically detectable MGJ treated with "split-full-split MGJ-repositioning vestibular extension procedure." The MGJ, which formed apically at a 1-month postsurgical visit compared to the presurgical position, remained stable for 6 months to 1-year follow-up period at both detectable and nondetectable sites.
关于临床上无法检测到的牙齿术后龈黏膜联合处(MGJ)形成的数据非常有限。
本研究的目的是评估在多颗相邻牙齿进行前庭扩展手术后6个月,临床上无法检测到MGJ的牙齿上MGJ的形成和稳定性。
这项前瞻性干预单臂临床研究在牙周病科进行,该研究获得了纳西克市穆罕默德医学大学机构伦理委员会的批准,并在印度临床试验注册中心注册。
本试验纳入了22名年龄在18至50岁之间的男女参与者,包括临床上无法检测到MGJ的牙齿以及相邻可检测到MGJ的牙齿。在基线、术前、术后即刻、术后1个月和6个月随访时记录以下临床参数:菌斑指数、牙龈指数、MGJ位置、牙龈边缘水平、探诊深度、角化龈宽度、附着龈宽度、临床附着水平和前庭深度。
描述性统计包括均值、中位数、众数等,所做的推断性统计为方差分析以及Tukey检验和独立样本检验。
由于采用前庭扩展程序进行全部分离-重新定位MGJ,从基线到6个月观察到MGJ向根尖移位,具有统计学意义(<0.05)。通过临床和生化方法在无法检测到MGJ的部位描绘了MGJ的形成。与1个月相比,6个月时MGJ的冠向迁移无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后6个月,在可检测和不可检测部位MGJ均保持稳定。
在本研究的局限性范围内,我们可以得出结论,接受“全部分离-重新定位MGJ前庭扩展程序”治疗的临床上无法检测到MGJ的参与者中,MGJ有明确形成。与术前位置相比,术后1个月在根尖形成的MGJ在可检测和不可检测部位在6个月至1年的随访期内均保持稳定。