Montes Cardona Jorge A, Hincapié Erira Diego A, Nati-Castillo Humberto Alejandro, Sánchez-Vallejo Jaime, Izquierdo-Condoy Juan S
Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad del Quindío, Armenia, Colombia.
Pneumology Service, IPS Neumovida, Armenia, Colombia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Aug 16;17:2025-2038. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S417375. eCollection 2023.
The aim of this research was to evaluate the technique of using inhaled drugs in patients with a confirmed history of COPD and describe errors in inhaler technique.
Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with a history of COPD using inhalation therapy, attending pulmonology consultation between August 2020 and April 2021 in Armenia, Colombia. A non-probabilistic sample of 80 adult participants was calculated, and the inhalation technique was evaluated (depending on the device used) using a scale validated for Colombia. Descriptive analysis of the qualitative variables was performed using frequencies and percentages. The Chi-Square test and Fisher's exact test (in corresponding cases) were used to look for association relationships between categorical variables.
A total of 80 participants were evaluated, of which 66.3% (n = 53) were male, and 32.5% were older than 80 years. Clinically, 30.0% (n = 24) were classified as Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) grade 3, and 51.2% (n = 41) had at least one exacerbation per year. The main comorbidity was hypertension (40.3%). Pressurized metered-dose inhalers with spacer were the most used device at 22.7% (n = 39). Incorrect technique (at least one error in the steps of the inhalation technique used) was found in 48.7%. The most frequent error among all the techniques was the failure to perform pre-inspiratory exhalation. No significant differences were observed between the development of the technique and the characteristics of the participants.
Nearly half of the patients who use inhalation devices make errors in the technique. Patient education and training of healthcare personnel represent a fundamental pillar in mitigating the incorrect use of these devices.
本研究旨在评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)确诊病史患者吸入药物的使用技术,并描述吸入器技术中的错误。
对2020年8月至2021年4月在亚美尼亚、哥伦比亚参加肺病咨询门诊且有COPD病史并使用吸入疗法的患者进行描述性横断面研究。计算了80名成年参与者的非概率样本,并使用经过哥伦比亚验证的量表评估吸入技术(取决于所使用的装置)。使用频率和百分比对定性变量进行描述性分析。使用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验(在相应情况下)寻找分类变量之间的关联关系。
共评估了80名参与者,其中66.3%(n = 53)为男性,32.5%年龄超过80岁。临床上,30.0%(n = 24)被分类为改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)3级,51.2%(n = 41)每年至少有一次病情加重。主要合并症为高血压(40.3%)。带储雾罐的压力定量吸入器是使用最多的装置,占22.7%(n = 39)。发现48.7%的患者存在技术错误(在所使用的吸入技术步骤中至少有一个错误)。所有技术中最常见的错误是未进行吸气前呼气。在技术熟练程度与参与者特征之间未观察到显著差异。
近一半使用吸入装置的患者在技术上存在错误。患者教育和医护人员培训是减少这些装置使用不当的重要支柱。