Perruccio Anthony V, Badley Elizabeth M, Antflek Daniel, Power J Denise, Baltzer Heather
Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada.
Arthritis Community Research and Epidemiology Unit (ACREU), Canada.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Aug 10;5(4):100397. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100397. eCollection 2023 Dec.
In OA studies, the focus often is on an index-joint; other affected joint sites are often overlooked. In this thumb-base OA study, we documented the frequency of symptomatic non-hand joint sites and investigated whether their count was associated with thumb-specific functional and patient-reported outcome measures.
Patients seeking care for thumb-base OA (conservative or surgical) were included. A patient-completed questionnaire captured sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptomatic hand and non-hand joint sites, and outcome measures (thumb-base pain intensity, symptoms and disability (TASD) and upper-extremity disability/symptoms (quickDASH)). Grip and pinch strength were measured. Linear regressions examined the association between each outcome and symptomatic joint site count, adjusted for several covariates.
The mean age of the 145 patients was 62 years, 72% were female. Mean symptomatic non-hand joint site count was 3.6. Ten percent reported only their hands as symptomatic; 30% reported 2-3 other symptomatic sites, and 49% reported 4+. From cross-sectional multivariable analyses, a higher symptomatic non-hand joint site count was associated with worse scores for all patient-reported outcomes and grip strength. Every unit increase in joint site count (49% had a 4+ count) was associated with a 2.1-3.3 unit increase (worse) in patient-reported outcome scores (all p < 0.02).
In this sample, nearly 80% of patients had 2+ symptomatic non-hand joint sites. These symptoms were associated with worse thumb- and hand-specific outcomes, suggesting a need for awareness of whole body OA burden, with implications for outcome score interpretations, study designs, and provision of care in thumb-base OA.
在骨关节炎(OA)研究中,重点通常放在一个指标关节上;其他受影响的关节部位常常被忽视。在这项拇指基底OA研究中,我们记录了有症状的非手部关节部位的出现频率,并调查了其数量是否与拇指特定功能及患者报告的结局指标相关。
纳入寻求拇指基底OA治疗(保守或手术)的患者。患者完成的问卷收集了社会人口统计学和健康特征、有症状的手部和非手部关节部位以及结局指标(拇指基底疼痛强度、症状和残疾(TASD)以及上肢残疾/症状(quickDASH))。测量了握力和捏力。线性回归分析了每个结局与有症状关节部位数量之间的关联,并对多个协变量进行了调整。
145名患者的平均年龄为62岁,72%为女性。有症状的非手部关节部位平均数量为3.6个。10%的患者报告仅手部有症状;30%的患者报告有2 - 3个其他有症状部位,49%的患者报告有4个及以上。从横断面多变量分析来看,有症状的非手部关节部位数量越多,所有患者报告的结局和握力得分越差。关节部位数量每增加一个单位(49%的患者有4个及以上关节部位),患者报告的结局得分就增加2.1 - 3.3个单位(更差)(所有p < 0.02)。
在这个样本中,近80%的患者有2个及以上有症状的非手部关节部位。这些症状与更差的拇指和手部特定结局相关,这表明需要认识到全身OA负担,这对结局得分的解释、研究设计以及拇指基底OA的治疗提供都有影响。