Zarei Mohammad Javad, Ramezani Maral, Sahraie Zahra, Shadnia Shahin, Erfan Talab Evini Peyman, Mostafazadeh Babak, Rahimi Mitra
School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 15;11(1):e46. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2047. eCollection 2023.
Even though naloxone is the main treatment for methadone poisoning treatment there are controversies about the proper method of its tapering. This study aimed to compare two methods in this regard.
This study was a prospective, single-blind pilot quasi-experimental study on non-addicted adult patients poisoned with methadone. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In one group, after stabilization of respiratory conditions and consciousness, naloxone was tapered using the half-life of methadone and in the other group, naloxone was tapered using the half-life of naloxone. Recurrence of symptoms and changes in venous blood gas parameters were compared between groups as outcome.
52 patients were included (51.92% female). 31 cases entered Group A (tapering based on methadone's half-life) and 21 cases entered Group B (tapering based on naloxone's half-life). The two groups were similar regarding mean age (p = 0.575), gender distribution (p = 0.535), the cause of methadone use (p = 0.599), previous medical history (p = 0.529), previous methadone use (p = 0.654), drug use history (p = 0.444), and vital signs on arrival to emergency department (p = 0.054). The cases of re-decreasing consciousness during tapering (52.38% vs. 25.81%; p = 0.049) and after discontinuation of naloxone (72.73% vs. 37.50%; p = 0.050) were higher in the tapering based on naloxone half-life group. The relative risk reduction (RRR) for naloxone half-life group was -1.03 and for methadone half-life group was 0.51. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.53) and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 3.7 (95% CI= 1.87- 150.53). There was not any statistically significant difference between groups regarding pH, HCO3, and PCO2 changes during tapering and after naloxone discontinuation (p > 0.05). However, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), showed that in the tapering based on methadone's half-life group, the number of changes and stability in the normal range were better (p < 0.001).
It seems that, by tapering naloxone based on methadone's half-life, not only blood acid-base disorders are treated, but they also remain stable after discontinuation and the possibility of symptom recurrence is reduced.
尽管纳洛酮是美沙酮中毒治疗的主要药物,但关于其逐渐减量的恰当方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较这方面的两种方法。
本研究是一项针对非成瘾成年美沙酮中毒患者的前瞻性、单盲试点准实验研究。患者被随机分为两组。一组在呼吸状况和意识稳定后,根据美沙酮的半衰期逐渐减少纳洛酮用量;另一组则根据纳洛酮的半衰期逐渐减少纳洛酮用量。比较两组症状复发情况及静脉血气参数变化作为研究结果。
共纳入52例患者(女性占51.92%)。31例进入A组(基于美沙酮半衰期逐渐减量),21例进入B组(基于纳洛酮半衰期逐渐减量)。两组在平均年龄(p = 0.575)、性别分布(p = 0.535)、使用美沙酮的原因(p = 0.599)、既往病史(p = 0.529)、既往美沙酮使用情况(p = 0.654)、药物使用史(p = 0.444)以及到达急诊科时的生命体征(p = 0.0