Suppr超能文献

比较两种纳洛酮递减方法在美沙酮中毒管理中的应用;一项准实验研究。

Comparing Two Naloxone Tapering Methods in Management of Methadone Intoxication; a Quasi-experimental Study.

作者信息

Zarei Mohammad Javad, Ramezani Maral, Sahraie Zahra, Shadnia Shahin, Erfan Talab Evini Peyman, Mostafazadeh Babak, Rahimi Mitra

机构信息

School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 15;11(1):e46. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2047. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Even though naloxone is the main treatment for methadone poisoning treatment there are controversies about the proper method of its tapering. This study aimed to compare two methods in this regard.

METHOD

This study was a prospective, single-blind pilot quasi-experimental study on non-addicted adult patients poisoned with methadone. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In one group, after stabilization of respiratory conditions and consciousness, naloxone was tapered using the half-life of methadone and in the other group, naloxone was tapered using the half-life of naloxone. Recurrence of symptoms and changes in venous blood gas parameters were compared between groups as outcome.

RESULTS

52 patients were included (51.92% female). 31 cases entered Group A (tapering based on methadone's half-life) and 21 cases entered Group B (tapering based on naloxone's half-life). The two groups were similar regarding mean age (p = 0.575), gender distribution (p = 0.535), the cause of methadone use (p = 0.599), previous medical history (p = 0.529), previous methadone use (p = 0.654), drug use history (p = 0.444), and vital signs on arrival to emergency department (p = 0.054). The cases of re-decreasing consciousness during tapering (52.38% vs. 25.81%; p = 0.049) and after discontinuation of naloxone (72.73% vs. 37.50%; p = 0.050) were higher in the tapering based on naloxone half-life group. The relative risk reduction (RRR) for naloxone half-life group was -1.03 and for methadone half-life group was 0.51. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.01-0.53) and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 3.7 (95% CI= 1.87- 150.53). There was not any statistically significant difference between groups regarding pH, HCO3, and PCO2 changes during tapering and after naloxone discontinuation (p > 0.05). However, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), showed that in the tapering based on methadone's half-life group, the number of changes and stability in the normal range were better (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

It seems that, by tapering naloxone based on methadone's half-life, not only blood acid-base disorders are treated, but they also remain stable after discontinuation and the possibility of symptom recurrence is reduced.

摘要

引言

尽管纳洛酮是美沙酮中毒治疗的主要药物,但关于其逐渐减量的恰当方法仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较这方面的两种方法。

方法

本研究是一项针对非成瘾成年美沙酮中毒患者的前瞻性、单盲试点准实验研究。患者被随机分为两组。一组在呼吸状况和意识稳定后,根据美沙酮的半衰期逐渐减少纳洛酮用量;另一组则根据纳洛酮的半衰期逐渐减少纳洛酮用量。比较两组症状复发情况及静脉血气参数变化作为研究结果。

结果

共纳入52例患者(女性占51.92%)。31例进入A组(基于美沙酮半衰期逐渐减量),21例进入B组(基于纳洛酮半衰期逐渐减量)。两组在平均年龄(p = 0.575)、性别分布(p = 0.535)、使用美沙酮的原因(p = 0.599)、既往病史(p = 0.529)、既往美沙酮使用情况(p = 0.654)、药物使用史(p = 0.444)以及到达急诊科时的生命体征(p = 0.0

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d91/10440751/d088953a6daf/aaem-11-e46-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验