Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Dec 1;37(12):e613-e624. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004546. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
Gillen, ZM. Percentile rankings and position differences for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures from the National Football League scouting combine. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): e613-e624, 2023-This study aimed to provide percentile rankings for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures for National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine subjects and determine if allometric scaling affected position-specific differences in performance measures. Subjects included American football players ( n = 3,015) who participated in the NFL Scouting Combines between 2015 and 2019. Subjects were divided into position groups: defensive backs (DBs, n = 562), defensive linemen (DL, n = 498), linebackers (LBs, n = 395), offensive linemen (OL, n = 505), running backs (RBs, n = 303), tight ends (TEs, n = 165), quarterbacks (QBs, n = 165), and wide receivers (WRs, n = 422). Performance measures included 40-yd dash time (with 10- and 20-yd split times), bench press repetitions to failure, vertical jump height, broad jump distance, pro-agility time, and L-cone drill time. Descriptive statistics were computed for all performance metrics and allometrically scaled performance metrics. One-way analyses of variance tested for position group differences for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures. Percentile rankings for absolute and allometrically scaled performance measures were determined. Position-specific differences for absolute performance measures indicated that DB and WR tended to be faster, jump higher and further, and have greater change-of-direction capabilities compared with LB, QB, RB, and TE, who scored better in these respects than OL and DL. Allometric scaling revealed that DL, LB, RB, and TE tended to have superior performance than DB and WR, with QB and OL having the poorest performance. This study provides percentile rankings and the equation and parameters by which coaches and practitioners may allometrically scale data for evaluations of normalized performance measures from the NFL Scouting Combine.
吉尔伦,ZM。全国橄榄球联盟(NFL)选秀联合体能测试的绝对和相对比例性能测量的百分等级排名和位置差异。J 力量与体能研究 37(12):e613-e624,2023-本研究旨在为 NFL 选秀联合体能测试受试者的绝对和相对比例性能测量提供百分等级排名,并确定相对比例缩放是否会影响特定位置的性能测量差异。受试者包括参加 2015 年至 2019 年 NFL 选秀联合体能测试的美式足球运动员(n=3015)。受试者被分为位置组:防守后卫(DBs,n=562),防守线卫(DL,n=498),线卫(LBs,n=395),进攻线卫(OL,n=505),跑卫(RBs,n=303),紧身端(TEs,n=165),四分卫(QBs,n=165)和外接手(WRs,n=422)。性能测量包括 40 码短跑时间(包括 10 码和 20 码分段时间)、卧推重复至失败次数、垂直跳跃高度、跳远距离、职业敏捷性时间和 L 形钻时间。计算了所有性能指标和相对比例性能指标的描述性统计数据。单向方差分析测试了绝对和相对比例性能指标的位置组差异。确定了绝对和相对比例性能指标的百分等级排名。绝对性能指标的位置特异性差异表明,与 LB、QB、RB 和 TE 相比,DB 和 WR 往往更快、跳得更高、更远,并且具有更大的变向能力,而 OL 和 DL 在这些方面得分更高。相对比例缩放显示,DL、LB、RB 和 TE 往往比 DB 和 WR 具有更好的性能,而 QB 和 OL 的表现最差。本研究提供了百分等级排名以及教练和从业者可以对 NFL 选秀联合体能测试的标准化性能测量进行相对比例缩放的方程和参数。