Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2023 Nov;53(11):1177-1186. doi: 10.1111/cea.14390. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
It is unclear if predictors of asthma attacks are the same as those of asthma symptom control in children.
We evaluated predictors for these two outcomes in a clinical cohort study.
The Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC) is a multicentre prospective clinical cohort of children referred to paediatric pulmonologists. This analysis included 516 children (5-16 years old) diagnosed with asthma. At baseline, we collected sociodemographic information, symptoms, personal and family history and environmental exposures from a parental baseline questionnaire, and treatment and test results from hospital records. Outcomes were assessed 1 year later by parental questionnaire: asthma control in the last 4 weeks as defined by GINA guidelines, and asthma attacks defined as any unscheduled visit for asthma in the past year. We used logistic regression to identify and compare predictors for suboptimal asthma control and asthma attacks.
At follow-up, 114/516 children (22%), reported suboptimal asthma control, and 114 (22%) an incident asthma attack. Only 37 (7%) reported both. Suboptimal asthma control was associated with poor symptom control at baseline (e.g. ≥1 night wheeze/week OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 1.7-6), wheeze triggered by allergens (2.2; 1.4-3.3), colds (2.3; 1.4-3.6) and exercise (3.2; 2-5), a more intense treatment at baseline (2.4; 1.3-4.4 for Step 3 vs. 1), history of preschool (2.6; 1.5-4.4) and persistent wheeze (2; 1.4-3.2), and exposure to tobacco smoke (1.7; 1-2.6). Incident asthma attacks were associated with previous episodes of severe wheeze (2; 1.2-3.3) and asthma attacks (2.8; 1.6-5 for emergency care visits), younger age (0.8; 0.8-0.9 per 1 year) and non-Swiss origin (0.3; 0.2-0.5 for Swiss origin). Lung function, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and allergic sensitization at baseline were not associated with control or attacks.
Children at risk of long-term suboptimal asthma control differ from those at risk of attacks. Prediction tools and preventive efforts should differentiate these two asthma outcomes.
目前尚不清楚哮喘发作的预测因素是否与儿童哮喘症状控制的预测因素相同。
我们在一项临床队列研究中评估了这两种结局的预测因素。
瑞士儿科气道队列(SPAC)是一个多中心前瞻性临床队列,纳入了被儿科肺科医生转介的儿童。该分析纳入了 516 名(5-16 岁)被诊断为哮喘的儿童。在基线时,我们从父母基线问卷中收集了社会人口统计学信息、症状、个人和家族史以及环境暴露情况,从医院记录中收集了治疗和检查结果。在 1 年后通过父母问卷评估结局:根据 GINA 指南定义的过去 4 周哮喘控制情况,以及过去 1 年中任何因哮喘而未预约就诊的哮喘发作情况。我们使用逻辑回归来确定和比较两种结局的预测因素。
随访时,516 名儿童中有 114 名(22%)报告哮喘控制不佳,114 名(22%)报告哮喘发作。只有 37 名(7%)同时报告这两种情况。哮喘控制不佳与基线时症状控制不佳相关(例如每周≥1 晚喘息/周,比值比[OR]:3.2;95%置信区间[CI]:1.7-6)、过敏原触发的喘息(2.2;1.4-3.3)、感冒(2.3;1.4-3.6)和运动(3.2;2-5)、基线时更强烈的治疗(第 3 步 vs. 1,2.4;1.3-4.4)、学龄前病史(2.6;1.5-4.4)和持续喘息(2;1.4-3.2),以及接触烟草烟雾(1.7;1-2.6)。哮喘发作与既往严重喘息(2;1.2-3.3)和哮喘发作(急诊就诊时,2.8;1.6-5)相关,与年龄较小(每增加 1 岁,0.8;0.8-0.9)和非瑞士血统(瑞士血统的 0.3;0.2-0.5)相关。基线时的肺功能、呼气一氧化氮(FeNO)和过敏敏化与控制或发作均无关。
有发生长期哮喘控制不佳风险的儿童与有发生哮喘发作风险的儿童不同。预测工具和预防措施应区分这两种哮喘结局。