Suppr超能文献

[一种评估早产儿脑成熟度新方法的初步研究]

[A preliminary study on a new method for evaluating brain maturation in preterm infants].

作者信息

Tian Yi-Li, Fang Xiu-Ying, Wang Ying-Jie, Mao Jian

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 15;25(8):805-811. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2303144.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To establish a new method for evaluating the brain maturation of preterm infants based on the features of electroencephalographic activity.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on the video electroencephalography (vEEG) and amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) recordings within 7 days after birth of preterm infants who had a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 25-36 weeks and met the inclusion criteria. The background activity of aEEG+conventional electroencephalography (cEEG) was scored according to the features of brain maturation as a new evaluation system and was compared with the aEEG evaluation system. The correlations of the evaluation results of the two methods with gestational age (GA), PMA, and head circumference were evaluated. The intervals of the total scores of aEEG+cEEG and aEEG were calculated for preterm infants with different PMAs and were compared between groups. The consistency of the new scoring system was evaluated among different raters.

RESULTS

A total of 52 preterm infants were included. The total scores of aEEG+cEEG and aEEG were positively correlated with GA, PMA, and head circumference (<0.05), and the correlation coefficient between the total scores of the two systems and PMA and GA was >0.9. The normal score intervals for aEEG+cEEG and aEEG scoring systems were determined in preterm infants with different PMAs as follows: infants with a PMA of less than 28 weeks had scores of 13.0 (11.0, 14.0) points for aEEG+cEEG and 6.0 (4.0, 7.0) points for aEEG; infants with a PMA between 28 and 29 weeks had scores of 16.0 (14.5, 17.0) points for aEEG+cEEG and 8.0 (6.0, 8.0) points for aEEG; infants with a PMA between 30 and 31 weeks had scores of 18.0 (17.0, 21.0) points for aEEG+cEEG and 9.0 (8.0, 10.0) points for aEEG; infants with between 32 and 33 weeks had scores of 22.0 (20.0, 24.5) points for aEEG+cEEG and 10.0 (10.0, 10.8) points for aEEG; infants with a PMA between 34 and 36 weeks had scores of 26.0 (24.5, 27.5) points for aEEG+cEEG and 11.0 (10.0, 12.0) points for aEEG. There were significant differences in the total scores of aEEG+cEEG and aEEG among the different PMA groups (<0.05). There was a high consistency between different raters when using the scoring system to evaluate the brain maturation of preterm infants (=0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

The aEEG+cEEG scoring system established in this study can quantitatively reflect the brain maturation of preterm infants, with a good discriminatory ability between preterm infants with different PMAs and high consistency between different raters.

摘要

目的

基于脑电图活动特征建立一种评估早产儿脑成熟度的新方法。

方法

对出生后7天内、孕龄25 - 36周且符合纳入标准的早产儿进行视频脑电图(vEEG)和振幅整合脑电图(aEEG)记录的前瞻性研究。将aEEG + 常规脑电图(cEEG)的背景活动按照脑成熟度特征进行评分,作为一种新的评估系统,并与aEEG评估系统进行比较。评估两种方法的评估结果与胎龄(GA)、孕龄(PMA)和头围的相关性。计算不同孕龄早产儿aEEG + cEEG和aEEG总分的区间,并进行组间比较。评估新评分系统在不同评分者之间的一致性。

结果

共纳入52例早产儿。aEEG + cEEG和aEEG的总分与GA、PMA和头围呈正相关(<0.05),且两个系统总分与PMA和GA的相关系数>0.9。不同孕龄早产儿aEEG + cEEG和aEEG评分系统的正常评分区间如下:孕龄小于28周的婴儿,aEEG + cEEG评分为13.0(11.0,14.0)分,aEEG评分为6.0(4.0,7.0)分;孕龄在28至29周之间的婴儿,aEEG + cEEG评分为16.0(14.5,17.0)分,aEEG评分为8.0(6.0, 8.0)分;孕龄在30至31周之间的婴儿,aEEG + cEEG评分为18.0(17.0,21.0)分,aEEG评分为9.0(8.0,10.0)分;孕龄在32至33周之间的婴儿,aEEG + cEEG评分为22.0(20.0,24.5)分,aEEG评分为10.0(10.0,10.8)分;孕龄在34至36周之间的婴儿,aEEG + cEEG评分为26.0(24.5,27.5)分,aEEG评分为11.0(10.0,12.0)分。不同孕龄组之间aEEG + cEEG和aEEG的总分存在显著差异(<0.05)。使用该评分系统评估早产儿脑成熟度时,不同评分者之间具有较高的一致性(=0.86)。

结论

本研究建立的aEEG + cEEG评分系统能够定量反映早产儿的脑成熟度,对不同孕龄的早产儿具有良好的鉴别能力,且在不同评分者之间具有较高的一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验