Suppr超能文献

轻度至中度舒张压的轻度中风患者从双重抗血小板治疗中获益更大。

Minor stroke patients with mild-moderate diastolic blood pressure derive greater benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy.

作者信息

Liu Tingting, Wang Yongle, Li Yanan, Zhang Kaili, Fan Haimei, Ren Jing, Li Juan, Li Yali, Li Xinyi, Wu Xuemei, Wang Junhui, Xue Lixi, Gao Xiaolei, Yan Yuping, Li Gaimei, Liu Qingping, Niu Wenhua, Du Wenxian, Liu Yuting, Niu Xiaoyuan

机构信息

Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 85, Jiefang Nan Street, Yingze District, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

Shanxi Medical University, No. 58, Xinjian Nan Street, Yingze District, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2024 Feb;47(2):291-301. doi: 10.1038/s41440-023-01422-8. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

Abstract

Not only systolic blood pressure (SBP) but also diastolic blood pressure (DBP) increases the risk of recurrence in the short- or long-term outcomes of stroke. The interaction between DBP and antiplatelet treatment for China stroke patients is unclear. This multicenter, observational cohort study included 2976 minor ischemic stroke patients. Patients accepted single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after arrival, and baseline DBP levels were trichotomized into <90 mmHg, 90-110 mmHg and ≥110 mmHg. We explore the interaction effect between antiplatelet therapy and DBP on 90-days composite vascular events. A total of 257 (8.6%) patients reached a composite vascular event during follow-up. The interaction term between DBP levels and treatment group (SAPT vs. DAPT) was significant (P for interaction = 0.013). DAPT's adjusted HR for composite events in patients with DBP between 90 and 110 mmHg was 0.56 (95% confidence interval, 0.36 0.88; P = 0.011) and DBP ≥ 110 mmHg was 4.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-19.94; P = 0.046). The association between treatment and DBP was still consistent after propensity score matching of the baseline characteristics. The interaction term of DBP ×  treatment was not significant for the safety outcomes of severe bleeding (P for interaction = 0.301) or hemorrhage stroke (P for interaction = 0.831). In this cohort study based on the real world, patients with a DBP between 90 and 110 mmHg received a greater benefit from 90 days of DAPT than those with lower and higher baseline DBP. REGISTRATION: ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ; Unique identifier: ChiCTR1900025214).

摘要

收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)均会增加卒中短期或长期预后复发的风险。在中国卒中患者中,DBP与抗血小板治疗之间的相互作用尚不清楚。这项多中心观察性队列研究纳入了2976例轻度缺血性卒中患者。患者入院后接受单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT)或双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),基线DBP水平被分为<90 mmHg、90 - 110 mmHg和≥110 mmHg三组。我们探讨了抗血小板治疗与DBP对90天复合血管事件的交互作用。共有257例(8.6%)患者在随访期间发生了复合血管事件。DBP水平与治疗组(SAPT与DAPT)之间的交互项具有显著性(交互作用P = 0.013)。DBP在90至110 mmHg之间的患者,DAPT对复合事件的调整后风险比(HR)为0.56(95%置信区间,0.36 - 0.88;P = 0.011),DBP≥110 mmHg的患者为4.35(95%置信区间,1.11 - 19.94;P = 0.046)。在对基线特征进行倾向评分匹配后,治疗与DBP之间的关联仍然一致。对于严重出血(交互作用P = 0.301)或出血性卒中(交互作用P = 0.831)的安全性结局,DBP×治疗的交互项无显著性。在这项基于现实世界的队列研究中,DBP在90至110 mmHg之间的患者在90天DAPT治疗中比基线DBP较低和较高的患者获益更大。注册信息:(https://www.chictr.org.cn;唯一标识符:ChiCTR1900025214)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/324b/10838769/ba1fcf953077/41440_2023_1422_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验