Programa de Pós-graduação "Mestrado e Doutorado" em Distúrbios da Comunicação, Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná - UTP - Curitiba (PR), Brasil.
Departamento de Educação, Universidade Estadual do Paraná - UNESPAR - Curitiba (PR), Brasil.
Codas. 2023 Sep 1;35(4):e20220108. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022108pt. eCollection 2023.
To analyze the possible differences among the hearing of farmers and their families when compared to the population not exposed to pesticides.
Cross-sectional study with 70 smallholder family farmers (research group), with the mean age of 39.7 years, of both sexes and a mean of 23.7 years of exposure to pesticides. We included a control group with 71 participants of both sexes with the mean age of 39.5 years, not exposed to either noise or chemical substances, to compare the results. In stage 1, both groups were submitted to conventional and high-frequency audiometry, and acoustic immittance. In stage 2, only people with normal hearing were submitted to the evoked otoacoustic emissions and suppression effect on transient otoacoustic emissions.
Significant differences were observed between the groups in the conventional pure-tone and in the high-frequency audiometry, as well as in the acoustic reflex. The most affected frequencies in the conventional pure-tone audiometry ranged from 3 to 6 kHz and, in the high-frequency audiometry, from 9000 to 11200 Hz. As for the transient otoacoustic emissions, the worse suppression effect results were found in the research group.
There were differences among the hearing of family farmers and the control group. The conventional auditory thresholds are related to the group, age and sex. Farming is associated with impairments in the basal region of the cochlea, absence of acoustic reflex, reduced signal-to-noise ratio of the transient otoacoustic emissions, and dysfunction in the olivocochlear efferents of the auditory system.
分析与未接触农药人群相比,农民及其家庭成员的听力可能存在的差异。
这是一项横断面研究,纳入了 70 名小农户家庭农民(研究组),他们的平均年龄为 39.7 岁,接触农药的平均时间为 23.7 年。我们还纳入了 71 名年龄为 39.5 岁的、无噪声或化学物质暴露的性别匹配的对照组参与者,以比较结果。在第 1 阶段,两组均接受常规和高频听力测试以及声导抗测试。在第 2 阶段,仅对听力正常的人员进行诱发耳声发射和瞬态耳声发射抑制效应测试。
在常规纯音和高频听力测试以及声反射方面,两组间存在显著差异。常规纯音听力测试中受影响最严重的频率在 3 至 6 kHz 之间,而在高频听力测试中,受影响最严重的频率在 9000 至 11200 Hz 之间。在瞬态耳声发射方面,研究组的抑制效应结果更差。
家庭农民与对照组的听力存在差异。常规听力阈值与组、年龄和性别有关。农业活动与耳蜗底部区域的损伤、声反射缺失、瞬态耳声发射的信噪比降低以及听觉系统的橄榄耳蜗传出神经功能障碍有关。