Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下氰基丙烯酸酯注射治疗食管胃静脉曲张 1 型:一项单中心随机研究。

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided injection of cyanoacrylate in the treatment of gastroesophageal varices type 1: a single-center randomized study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Anhui Province, Jixi Road 218, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8277-8284. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10342-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

First, it has been demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection (EUS-CYA) has greater efficacy than direct endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate (DEI-CYA) for treating type 1-isolated gastric varices. However, it is necessary to conduct further studies to determine whether EUS has any advantage over the current guidelines for treating gastroesophageal varices type 1 (GOV1). Second, liver function is an important prognostic factor in patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, we evaluated the liver function of patients treated with EUS-CYA.

METHODS

In a single-center study, a prospective cohort from February 2021 to September 2022 involving 89 patients with cirrhosis with GOV1 were assigned to undergo EUS-CYA (n = 45) or DEI-CYA (n = 44). The success rate of CYA injection, the rate of overall rebleeding, the rate of reintervention, the complications during the follow-up period, and the liver function were compared.

RESULTS

In both groups, 100% of the operations were successful. The follow-up time of the two groups was 290 (153-398) days and 267 (177-416) days, respectively. In the EUS group, the perforating veins had an average diameter of 7.0 ± 2.7 mm, and they had a 100% occlusion rate. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of sessions needed to eradicate GV (p = 0.005, pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Bonferroni correction method.), the late rebleeding rate after EUS-CYA [n = 3 (6.7%) vs n = 10 (22.7%); p = 0.032], and the incidence of postinjection ulcers [n = 4 (8.9%) vs n = 12 (27.3); p = 0.023)]. Following EUS or DEI-CYA treatment, the patient's liver function did not show any significant deterioration or decline.

CONCLUSION

EUS-CYA has a higher eradication success rate and fewer complications, recurrences, and rebleeding episodes than DEI-CYA used for GOV1 treatment. In addition, EUS-CYA did not impair liver function.

摘要

背景与目的

首先,已经证明内镜超声引导下氰基丙烯酸酯(EUS-CYA)注射(EUS-CYA)治疗 1 型孤立性胃静脉曲张的疗效优于直接内镜下注射氰基丙烯酸酯(DEI-CYA)。然而,有必要进一步研究以确定 EUS 治疗胃食管静脉曲张 1 型(GOV1)是否优于目前的指南。其次,肝功能是肝硬化患者的重要预后因素。因此,我们评估了接受 EUS-CYA 治疗的患者的肝功能。

方法

在一项单中心研究中,来自 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 9 月的 89 名肝硬化合并 GOV1 的患者被前瞻性分配至接受 EUS-CYA(n=45)或 DEI-CYA(n=44)治疗。比较两组的 CYA 注射成功率、总体再出血率、再干预率、随访期间的并发症以及肝功能。

结果

两组的手术均 100%成功。两组的随访时间分别为 290(153-398)天和 267(177-416)天。EUS 组穿通静脉的平均直径为 7.0±2.7mm,闭塞率为 100%。两组在需要消除 GV 的治疗次数[EUS-CYA 后迟发性出血率:n=3(6.7%)比 n=10(22.7%);p=0.032]、EUS-CYA 后穿孔溃疡的发生率[n=4(8.9%)比 n=12(27.3%);p=0.023]方面存在统计学差异。EUS 或 DEI-CYA 治疗后,患者肝功能无明显恶化或下降。

结论

EUS-CYA 治疗 GOV1 的根除成功率更高,并发症、复发和再出血发生率更低。此外,EUS-CYA 不会损害肝功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验