Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases of Anhui Province, Jixi Road 218, Hefei, 230022, Anhui, China.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8277-8284. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10342-0. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
First, it has been demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection (EUS-CYA) has greater efficacy than direct endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate (DEI-CYA) for treating type 1-isolated gastric varices. However, it is necessary to conduct further studies to determine whether EUS has any advantage over the current guidelines for treating gastroesophageal varices type 1 (GOV1). Second, liver function is an important prognostic factor in patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, we evaluated the liver function of patients treated with EUS-CYA.
In a single-center study, a prospective cohort from February 2021 to September 2022 involving 89 patients with cirrhosis with GOV1 were assigned to undergo EUS-CYA (n = 45) or DEI-CYA (n = 44). The success rate of CYA injection, the rate of overall rebleeding, the rate of reintervention, the complications during the follow-up period, and the liver function were compared.
In both groups, 100% of the operations were successful. The follow-up time of the two groups was 290 (153-398) days and 267 (177-416) days, respectively. In the EUS group, the perforating veins had an average diameter of 7.0 ± 2.7 mm, and they had a 100% occlusion rate. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of sessions needed to eradicate GV (p = 0.005, pairwise comparisons were conducted using the Bonferroni correction method.), the late rebleeding rate after EUS-CYA [n = 3 (6.7%) vs n = 10 (22.7%); p = 0.032], and the incidence of postinjection ulcers [n = 4 (8.9%) vs n = 12 (27.3); p = 0.023)]. Following EUS or DEI-CYA treatment, the patient's liver function did not show any significant deterioration or decline.
EUS-CYA has a higher eradication success rate and fewer complications, recurrences, and rebleeding episodes than DEI-CYA used for GOV1 treatment. In addition, EUS-CYA did not impair liver function.
首先,已经证明内镜超声引导下氰基丙烯酸酯(EUS-CYA)注射(EUS-CYA)治疗 1 型孤立性胃静脉曲张的疗效优于直接内镜下注射氰基丙烯酸酯(DEI-CYA)。然而,有必要进一步研究以确定 EUS 治疗胃食管静脉曲张 1 型(GOV1)是否优于目前的指南。其次,肝功能是肝硬化患者的重要预后因素。因此,我们评估了接受 EUS-CYA 治疗的患者的肝功能。
在一项单中心研究中,来自 2021 年 2 月至 2022 年 9 月的 89 名肝硬化合并 GOV1 的患者被前瞻性分配至接受 EUS-CYA(n=45)或 DEI-CYA(n=44)治疗。比较两组的 CYA 注射成功率、总体再出血率、再干预率、随访期间的并发症以及肝功能。
两组的手术均 100%成功。两组的随访时间分别为 290(153-398)天和 267(177-416)天。EUS 组穿通静脉的平均直径为 7.0±2.7mm,闭塞率为 100%。两组在需要消除 GV 的治疗次数[EUS-CYA 后迟发性出血率:n=3(6.7%)比 n=10(22.7%);p=0.032]、EUS-CYA 后穿孔溃疡的发生率[n=4(8.9%)比 n=12(27.3%);p=0.023]方面存在统计学差异。EUS 或 DEI-CYA 治疗后,患者肝功能无明显恶化或下降。
EUS-CYA 治疗 GOV1 的根除成功率更高,并发症、复发和再出血发生率更低。此外,EUS-CYA 不会损害肝功能。