Suppr超能文献

评估创伤性脑损伤的无创影像学生物标志物的状态。

Evaluating the state of non-invasive imaging biomarkers for traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Sep 8;46(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02085-2.

Abstract

Non-invasive imaging biomarkers are useful for prognostication in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at high risk for morbidity with invasive procedures. The authors present findings from a scoping review discussing the pertinent biomarkers. Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, and Scopus were queried for original research on imaging biomarkers for prognostication of TBI in adult patients. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Data was synthesized and confidence evaluated with the linked evidence according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Our search yielded 3104 unique citations, 44 of which were included in this review. Study populations varied in TBI severity, as defined by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), including: mild (n=9), mild and moderate (n=3), moderate and severe (n=7), severe (n=6), and all GCS scores (n=17). Diverse imaging modalities were used for prognostication, predominantly computed tomography (CT) only (n=11), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) only (n=9), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (N=9). The biomarkers included diffusion coefficient mapping, metabolic characteristics, optic nerve sheath diameter, T1-weighted signal changes, cortical cerebral blood flow, axial versus extra-axial lesions, T2-weighted gradient versus spin echo, translocator protein levels, and trauma imaging of brainstem areas. The majority (93%) of studies identified that the imaging biomarker of interest had a statistically significant prognostic value; however, these are based on a very low to low level of quality of evidence. No study directly compared the effects on specific TBI treatments on the temporal course of imaging biomarkers. The current literature is insufficient to make a strong recommendation about a preferred imaging biomarker for TBI, especially considering GRADE criteria revealing low quality of evidence. Rigorous prospective research of imaging biomarkers of TBI is warranted to improve the understanding of TBI severity.

摘要

非侵入性成像生物标志物可用于预测创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 高危患者的预后,这些患者因有创操作而存在发病风险。作者提出了一项范围综述的研究结果,讨论了相关的生物标志物。研究人员在 Embase、Ovid-MEDLINE 和 Scopus 中查询了有关成人 TBI 预后成像生物标志物的原始研究。两名审查员独立筛选文章、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。根据 Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(推荐评估、发展与评价)方法,通过链接证据对数据进行综合评估并评估置信度。搜索共产生 3104 个独特的引用,其中 44 个被纳入本综述。研究人群的 TBI 严重程度不同,定义为格拉斯哥昏迷量表 (GCS),包括:轻度(n=9)、轻度和中度(n=3)、中度和重度(n=7)、重度(n=6)和所有 GCS 评分(n=17)。用于预后的成像方式多种多样,主要包括计算机断层扫描(CT)(n=11)、磁共振成像(MRI)(n=9)和弥散张量成像(DTI)(n=9)。生物标志物包括弥散系数图、代谢特征、视神经鞘直径、T1 加权信号变化、皮质脑血流、轴外病变与轴外病变、T2 加权梯度与自旋回波、转位蛋白水平以及脑桥区域创伤成像。大多数(93%)研究认为感兴趣的成像生物标志物具有统计学显著的预后价值;然而,这些研究的证据质量处于极低或低水平。没有研究直接比较特定 TBI 治疗对成像生物标志物时间进程的影响。目前的文献不足以对 TBI 的首选成像生物标志物做出强烈推荐,特别是考虑到 GRADE 标准揭示了低质量的证据。有必要对 TBI 的成像生物标志物进行严格的前瞻性研究,以提高对 TBI 严重程度的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验