Yonezawa Hitoshi, Tanaka Shingo, Tanaka Makito, Kobayashi Ryo, Takahashi Satoshi
Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Division of Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; Department of Infection Control and Laboratory Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; Department of Medical Oncology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
J Infect Chemother. 2024 Jan;30(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
To prevent misreporting of false positives in the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) assay, it is recommended to confirm the low-positive cases with neutralization tests. However, currently not many facilities are implementing this due to the additional cost. The aim of this study was to clarify the risk factors for false positives in the high-sensitivity HBsAg quantitative tests to reduce the neutralization tests.
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 47,305 patients who had their HBsAg value measured at Sapporo Medical University Hospital between November 2016 and March 2022. The patients eligible for the neutralization tests were those with HBsAg values between 0.005 and 1.000, even after reexamination by high-speed centrifugation.
HBsAg quantitative tests were performed in 71,475 tests. Of these, 817 tests and 376 patients were subjected to neutralization tests. Of the patients who met the criteria, 329 were included in this study. Fifty-seven cases (17%) had negative results in the neutralization tests, suggesting false positives for the HBsAg assay. Multivariate analysis showed that younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.57), female sex (aOR 2.32), lower HBsAg values (aOR 59.6), and reagent improvement (aOR 2.06) were independent risk factors for false positives. The false-positive rate was actually high at 33.1% in the HBsAg range of 0.005-0.049 IU/mL and at 1.2% in the range above 0.050 IU/mL.
Confirmatory neutralization tests should be performed at least in the range of 0.005-0.049 IU/mL where quantification is possible with a higher-sensitivity assay.
为防止乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)检测中假阳性的误报,建议用中和试验来确认弱阳性病例。然而,由于额外成本,目前实施此方法的机构并不多。本研究的目的是明确高灵敏度HBsAg定量检测中假阳性的危险因素,以减少中和试验。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了2016年11月至2022年3月期间在札幌医科大学医院测量HBsAg值的47305例患者。符合中和试验条件的患者是那些即使经过高速离心复查后HBsAg值仍在0.005至1.000之间的患者。
共进行了71475次HBsAg定量检测。其中,817次检测和376例患者接受了中和试验。符合标准的患者中,329例纳入本研究。57例(17%)中和试验结果为阴性,提示HBsAg检测存在假阳性。多因素分析显示,年龄较小(校正比值比[aOR]6.57)、女性(aOR 2.32)、较低的HBsAg值(aOR 59.6)和试剂改进(aOR 2.06)是假阳性的独立危险因素。在HBsAg范围为0.005 - 0.049 IU/mL时,假阳性率实际高达33.1%,在0.050 IU/mL以上范围为1.2%。
至少应在0.005 - 0.049 IU/mL范围内进行验证性中和试验,在此范围内可以用更高灵敏度的检测方法进行定量。