• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FLASH-RT 并不会比 CONV-RT 剂量率产生更多的染色体易位和连接结构改变。

FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2695, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2023 Nov;188:109906. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109906. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109906
PMID:37690668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The impact of radiotherapy (RT) at ultra high vs conventional dose rate (FLASH vs CONV) on the generation and repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) is an important question that remains to be investigated. Here, we tested the hypothesis as to whether FLASH-RT generates decreased chromosomal translocations compared to CONV-RT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used two FLASH validated electron beams and high-throughput rejoin and genome-wide translocation sequencing (HTGTS-JoinT-seq), employing S. aureus and S. pyogenes Cas9 "bait" DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in HEK239T cells, to measure differences in bait-proximal repair and their genome-wide translocations to "prey" DSBs generated after various irradiation doses, dose rates and oxygen tensions (normoxic, 21% O; physiological, 4% O; hypoxic, 2% and 0.5% O). Electron irradiation was delivered using a FLASH capable Varian Trilogy and the eRT6/Oriatron at CONV (0.08-0.13 Gy/s) and FLASH (1x10-5x10 Gy/s) dose rates. Related experiments using clonogenic survival and γH2AX foci in the 293T and the U87 glioblastoma lines were also performed to discern FLASH-RT vs CONV-RT DSB effects.

RESULTS

Normoxic and physioxic irradiation of HEK293T cells increased translocations at the cost of decreasing bait-proximal repair but were indistinguishable between CONV-RT and FLASH-RT. Although no apparent increase in chromosome translocations was observed with hypoxia-induced apoptosis, the combined decrease in oxygen tension with IR dose-rate modulation did not reveal significant differences in the level of translocations nor in their junction structures. Furthermore, RT dose rate modality on U87 cells did not change γH2AX foci numbers at 1- and 24-hours post-irradiation nor did this affect 293T clonogenic survival.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of oxygen tension, FLASH-RT produces translocations and junction structures at levels and proportions that are indistinguishable from CONV-RT.

摘要

背景与目的

放射治疗(RT)在超高与常规剂量率(FLASH 与 CONV)下对 DNA 双链断裂(DSBs)的产生和修复的影响是一个尚未解决的重要问题。在此,我们通过测试下述假说,探究 FLASH-RT 是否比 CONV-RT 产生更少的染色体易位:FLASH-RT 生成的染色体易位比 CONV-RT 少。

材料与方法

我们使用两种经过 FLASH 验证的电子束和高通量重连及全基因组易位测序(HTGTS-JoinT-seq),在 HEK239T 细胞中使用金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性链球菌 Cas9“诱饵”DNA 双链断裂(DSBs),以测量不同照射剂量、剂量率和氧张力(常氧,21%O;生理氧,4%O;低氧,2%和 0.5%O)下,诱饵附近修复和其全基因组易位到“猎物”DSB 的差异。电子照射使用具备 FLASH 能力的瓦里安 Trilogy 和 eRT6/Oriatron 以 CONV(0.08-0.13 Gy/s)和 FLASH(1x10-5x10 Gy/s)剂量率进行。还使用 293T 和 U87 胶质母细胞瘤系中的克隆存活和 γH2AX 焦点相关实验,来辨别 FLASH-RT 与 CONV-RT DSB 效应。

结果

常氧和生理氧照射 HEK293T 细胞增加了易位,但以诱饵附近修复减少为代价,且在 CONV-RT 和 FLASH-RT 之间无法区分。虽然缺氧诱导凋亡时没有观察到染色体易位明显增加,但随着 IR 剂量率调制降低氧张力,并未发现易位水平或其连接结构有显著差异。此外,U87 细胞的 RT 剂量率模式不会改变照射后 1 小时和 24 小时的 γH2AX 焦点数量,也不会影响 293T 细胞的克隆存活。

结论

无论氧张力如何,FLASH-RT 产生的易位和连接结构的水平和比例与 CONV-RT 无法区分。

相似文献

1
FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates.FLASH-RT 并不会比 CONV-RT 剂量率产生更多的染色体易位和连接结构改变。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Nov;188:109906. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109906. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
2
FLASH-RT does not affect chromosome translocations and junction structures beyond that of CONV-RT dose-rates.与常规放疗剂量率相比,FLASH放疗不会影响染色体易位和连接结构。
bioRxiv. 2023 Mar 27:2023.03.27.534408. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.27.534408.
3
Identification of DNA double strand breaks at chromosome boundaries along the track of particle irradiation.沿着粒子辐照轨迹在染色体边界处鉴定DNA双链断裂。
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2016 Aug;55(8):650-60. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22367. Epub 2016 May 16.
4
Effects of Ultra-high doserate FLASH Irradiation on the Tumor Microenvironment in Lewis Lung Carcinoma: Role of Myosin Light Chain.超高剂量率 FLASH 照射对 Lewis 肺癌肿瘤微环境的影响:肌球蛋白轻链的作用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1440-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
The FLASH effect depends on oxygen concentration.FLASH 效应取决于氧浓度。
Br J Radiol. 2020 Feb 1;93(1106):20190702. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190702. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH and Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation Differentially Affect Human Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Normal Hematopoiesis.超高剂量率闪射放疗与常规剂量率放疗对人类急性淋巴细胞白血病和正常造血功能的影响存在差异。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 1;109(3):819-829. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.012. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
7
Comparable survival in rats with intracranial glioblastoma irradiated with single-fraction conventional radiotherapy or FLASH radiotherapy.接受单次分割常规放疗或FLASH放疗的颅内胶质母细胞瘤大鼠的生存情况相当。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 16;13:1309174. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1309174. eCollection 2023.
8
Maintenance of Tight Junction Integrity in the Absence of Vascular Dilation in the Brain of Mice Exposed to Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation.在超高剂量率 FLASH 照射下的小鼠大脑中,没有血管扩张的情况下维持紧密连接的完整性。
Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):625-635. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00060.1.
9
Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams.电子和质子 FLASH 射线束的剂量学和生物学比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:109953. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109953. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Ultra-High-Dose-Rate FLASH Irradiation Limits Reactive Gliosis in the Brain.超高剂量率 FLASH 辐照限制脑部反应性神经胶质增生。
Radiat Res. 2020 Dec 1;194(6):636-645. doi: 10.1667/RADE-20-00067.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of cost-effective multi-sample hypoxia chambers for proton ultra-high dose rate organoid irradiations.用于质子超高剂量率类器官辐照的经济高效多样本缺氧室的开发与验证
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 1;53:100970. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100970. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Mathematical modeling in radiotherapy for cancer: a comprehensive narrative review.癌症放射治疗中的数学建模:一项全面的叙述性综述。
Radiat Oncol. 2025 Apr 4;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02626-7.
3
Ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy: Revolutionizing tumor targeting and microenvironmental dynamics in cancer treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy.迈向 FLASH 放疗的临床转化。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec;19(12):791-803. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00697-z. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
2
Design and validation of a dosimetric comparison scheme tailored for ultra-high dose-rate electron beams to support multicenter FLASH preclinical studies.专为超高剂量率电子束设计和验证的剂量学比较方案,以支持多中心 FLASH 临床前研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Oct;175:203-209. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.023. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Quantifying the DNA-damaging Effects of FLASH Irradiation With Plasmid DNA.
超高剂量率(FLASH)放疗:革新癌症治疗中的肿瘤靶向和微环境动态变化
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Dec 20;137(24):3148-3150. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003369. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
FLASH Radiotherapy: Expectations, Challenges, and Current Knowledge.FLASH放疗:期望、挑战与当前认知
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Feb 22;25(5):2546. doi: 10.3390/ijms25052546.
用质粒DNA量化FLASH辐照的DNA损伤效应
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Jun 1;113(2):437-447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.049. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
Ultra-high dose rate electron beams and the FLASH effect: From preclinical evidence to a new radiotherapy paradigm.超高剂量率电子束和 FLASH 效应:从临床前证据到新的放射治疗范例。
Med Phys. 2022 Mar;49(3):2082-2095. doi: 10.1002/mp.15442. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Understanding the FLASH effect to unravel the potential of ultra-high dose rate irradiation.理解闪光效应,揭示超高剂量率照射的潜力。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(3):506-516. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2021.2004328. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
DNA End Joining: G0-ing to the Core.DNA 末端连接:深入核心的 G0 之旅。
Biomolecules. 2021 Oct 9;11(10):1487. doi: 10.3390/biom11101487.
7
eccDNAs are apoptotic products with high innate immunostimulatory activity.eccDNAs 是具有高先天免疫刺激性的凋亡产物。
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7884):308-314. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04009-w. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Development of β-globin gene correction in human hematopoietic stem cells as a potential durable treatment for sickle cell disease.β-珠蛋白基因校正在人类造血干细胞中的发展作为镰状细胞病的一种潜在持久治疗方法。
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Jun 16;13(598). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abf2444.
9
Ku70 suppresses alternative end joining in G1-arrested progenitor B cells.Ku70 抑制 G1 期阻滞祖 B 细胞中的非同源末端连接。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103630118.
10
Loop extrusion as a mechanism for formation of DNA damage repair foci.环挤出作为形成 DNA 损伤修复焦点的机制。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7847):660-665. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03193-z. Epub 2021 Feb 17.