Suppr超能文献

SenSmart™与INVOS™新生儿脑近红外光谱仪设备的比较。

Comparison of the SenSmart™ and the INVOS™ neonatal cerebral near-infrared spectrometry devices.

作者信息

Wirayannawat Wariphan, Amawat Jutharat, Yamsiri Nattaya, Paes Bosco, Kitsommart Ratchada

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nursing Division, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2023 Aug 25;11:1243977. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1243977. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the correlation and agreement between the SenSmart™ and the INVOS™ devices of neonatal cerebral regional oxygen saturation (CrSO) measurements using neonatal sensors. The secondary objective was to develop a regression model that predicts CrSO-INVOS values using CrSO-SenSmart indices and determine whether the values between the devices are interchangeable.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted in infants during the first 4 weeks of life. Simultaneous, bilateral CrSO was measured using the SenSmart™X100 (CrSO-SenSmart) or INVOS™ 5100C (CrSO-INVOS) device in each frontoparietal area for 2 h. Five-minute CrSO values were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty infants were recruited with 720 pairwise measurements and 26 (84%) were evaluated in the first week of life. Mean gestational age of the preterm and term infants was [30.9 ± 2.8 ( = 14) and 38.8 ± 1.1 ( = 16)] weeks, respectively. Overall CrSO- was 77.08 ± 9.70% and 71.45 ± 12.74% for the SenSmart and INVOS, respectively ( < 0.001). The correlation coefficient () between the CrSO-SenSmart and INVOS was 0.20 ( < 0.001). The mean difference between the CrSO-SenSmart and INVOS was 5.63 ± 13.87% with -21.6% to 32.8% limits of agreement. The and mean difference was 0.39 ( < 0.001) and 8.87 ± 12.58% in preterm infants, and 0.06 ( = 0.27) and 2.79 ± 14.34 in term infants.

CONCLUSION

The CrSO-SenSmart tended to read higher than the CrSO-INVOS device. There was no correlation between the CrSO-SenSmart and the CrSO-INVOS in term infants and it was weak in preterms. Due to imprecise agreement, the CrSO-SenSmart values are not interchangeable with those of the CrSO-INVOS.

摘要

目的

使用新生儿传感器确定SenSmart™和INVOS™设备在测量新生儿脑局部氧饱和度(CrSO)方面的相关性和一致性。次要目的是建立一个回归模型,该模型利用CrSO-SenSmart指数预测CrSO-INVOS值,并确定这两种设备所测值是否可互换。

方法

对出生后4周内的婴儿进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究。在每个额顶叶区域使用SenSmart™X100(CrSO-SenSmart)或INVOS™5100C(CrSO-INVOS)设备同时双侧测量CrSO,持续2小时。提取5分钟的CrSO值进行分析。

结果

招募了30名婴儿,进行了720次成对测量,其中26名(84%)在出生第一周接受评估。早产儿和足月儿的平均胎龄分别为[30.9±2.8(n = 14)和38.8±1.1(n = 16)]周。SenSmart和INVOS测量的总体CrSO分别为77.08±9.70%和71.45±12.74%(P < 0.001)。CrSO-SenSmart和INVOS之间的相关系数(r)为0.20(P < 0.001)。CrSO-SenSmart和INVOS之间的平均差异为5.63±13.87%,一致性界限为-21.6%至32.8%。早产儿的r和平均差异分别为0.39(P < 0.001)和8.87±12.58%,足月儿的r为0.06(P = 0.27),平均差异为2.79±14.34%。

结论

CrSO-SenSmart测量值往往高于CrSO-INVOS设备测量值。足月儿中CrSO-SenSmart和CrSO-INVOS之间无相关性,早产儿中相关性较弱。由于一致性不精确,CrSO-SenSmart值与CrSO-INVOS值不可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验