Suppr超能文献

腕管综合征的局部注射治疗:一项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析

Local injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhou TianQi, Wu ZhuoRao, Gou XingYun, Xia HaiSha, Ding JiLin, Ai ShuangChun

机构信息

College of Health and Rehabilitation, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mianyang Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Mianyang, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 24;14:1140410. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1140410. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Clinical research has shown that local injections for carpal tunnel syndrome reduce the symptoms of patients and enhance their quality of life considerably. However, there are several therapy options, and the optimal choice of regimen remains uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated the variations in clinical efficacy and safety of several medications for treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Computer searches of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were used to collect articles of randomized controlled trials on local injections for treating carpal tunnel syndrome from database creation till 10 June 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, and performed network Meta-analysis using Stata 17.0 software. Drug efficacy was assessed using symptom severity/function and pain intensity. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking was used to determine the advantage of each therapy. We included 26 randomized controlled trials with 1896 wrists involving 12 interventions, such as local injections of corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, 5% dextrose, progesterone, and hyaluronidase. The results of the network meta-analysis showed the following: (i) symptom severity: at the 3-month follow-up, D5W combined with splinting (SUCRA = 95%) ranked first, and hyaluronidase (SUCRA = 89.6%) at 6 months; (ii) functional severity: either at the 3-month follow-up (SUCRA = 89.5%) or 6 months (SUCRA = 83.6%), iii) pain intensity: 5% dextrose in water combined with splinting was the most effective at the 3-month (SUCRA = 85%) and 6-month (SUCRA = 87.6%) follow-up. Considering the combination of symptoms/function and pain intensity, combining 5% dextrose in water with splinting is probably the treatment of choice for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. It is more effective than glucocorticoids and no adverse effects have been observed. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022370525.

摘要

临床研究表明,腕管综合征的局部注射治疗可减轻患者症状,并显著提高其生活质量。然而,治疗方案有多种,最佳方案的选择仍不明确。因此,我们全面评估了几种治疗腕管综合征药物的临床疗效和安全性差异。通过计算机检索Embase、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库,收集从数据库创建至2023年6月10日关于腕管综合征局部注射治疗的随机对照试验文章。两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取信息、评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,并使用Stata 17.0软件进行网状Meta分析。采用症状严重程度/功能和疼痛强度评估药物疗效。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)排序来确定每种治疗方法的优势。我们纳入了26项随机对照试验,涉及1896只手腕,包括12种干预措施,如局部注射皮质类固醇、富血小板血浆、5%葡萄糖、孕酮和透明质酸酶。网状Meta分析结果显示:(i)症状严重程度:在3个月随访时,5%葡萄糖联合夹板固定(SUCRA = 95%)排名第一,6个月时透明质酸酶(SUCRA = 89.6%)排名第一;(ii)功能严重程度:在3个月随访时(SUCRA = 89.5%)或6个月时(SUCRA = 83.6%);(iii)疼痛强度:5%葡萄糖水联合夹板固定在3个月(SUCRA = 85%)和6个月(SUCRA = 87.6%)随访时最有效。综合考虑症状/功能和疼痛强度,5%葡萄糖水联合夹板固定可能是腕管综合征患者的首选治疗方法。它比糖皮质激素更有效,且未观察到不良反应。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42022370525

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00df/10484596/db6d42b71103/fphar-14-1140410-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验