Suppr超能文献

三种超声甲状腺结节危险分层系统(K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS 和 C-TIRADS)对滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤的诊断性能比较。

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of three ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification systems for follicular thyroid neoplasm: K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS and C-TIRADS.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

Department of Thyroid and Mammary Vascular Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2023;85(4):395-406. doi: 10.3233/CH-231898.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound-based thyroid nodule risk stratification systems (K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS, and C-TIRADS) in differentiating follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) from follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC).

METHODS

Clinical data and preoperative ultrasonographic images of 269 follicular thyroid neoplasms were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were detected by Color Doppler ultrasound instruments equipped with high-frequency liner array probes (e.g. Toshiba Apoli500 with L5-14MHZ; Philips IU22 with L5-12MHZ; GE LOGIQ E9 with L9-12MHZ and MyLab Class C with L9-14MHZ). The diagnostic performance of three TIRADS classifications for differentiating FTA from FTC was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the cut-off values.

RESULTS

Of the 269 follicular neoplasms (mean size, 3.67±1.53 cm), 209 were FTAs (mean size, 3.56±1.38 cm) and 60 were FTCs (mean size, 4.07±1.93 cm). There were significant differences in ultrasound features such as margins, calcifications, and vascularity of thyroid nodules between the FTA and FTC groups (P < 0.05). According to the ROC curve comparison analysis, the diagnostic cut-off values of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS for identifying FTA and FTC were K-TR4, ACR-TR4, and C-TR4B, respectively, and the areas under the curves were 0.676, 0.728, and 0.719, respectively. The difference between ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS classification was statistically significant (P = 0.0241), whereas the differences between ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification and between K-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The three TIRADS classifications were not conducive to distinguishing FTA from FTC. It is necessary to develop a novel malignant risk stratification system specifically for the identification of follicular thyroid neoplasms.

摘要

目的

探讨目前使用的基于超声的甲状腺结节风险分层系统(K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS 和 C-TIRADS)在鉴别滤泡状甲状腺腺瘤(FTA)与滤泡状甲状腺癌(FTC)中的诊断性能。

方法

回顾性分析 269 例滤泡状甲状腺肿瘤的临床资料和术前超声图像。所有患者均采用配备高频线性阵列探头的彩色多普勒超声仪器(如东芝 Apoli500 配 L5-14MHZ;飞利浦 IU22 配 L5-12MHZ;GE LOGIQ E9 配 L9-12MHZ 和 MyLab Class C 配 L9-14MHZ)进行检测。通过绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线并计算截断值,评估三种 TIRADS 分类在鉴别 FTA 与 FTC 中的诊断性能。

结果

在 269 例滤泡性肿瘤(平均大小为 3.67±1.53cm)中,209 例为 FTA(平均大小为 3.56±1.38cm),60 例为 FTC(平均大小为 4.07±1.93cm)。FTA 与 FTC 组之间甲状腺结节的边界、钙化和血管分布等超声特征存在显著差异(P<0.05)。根据 ROC 曲线比较分析,K-TIRADS、ACR-TIRADS 和 C-TIRADS 鉴别 FTA 和 FTC 的诊断截断值分别为 K-TR4、ACR-TR4 和 C-TR4B,曲线下面积分别为 0.676、0.728 和 0.719。ACR-TIRADS 与 K-TIRADS 分类之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.0241),而 ACR-TIRADS 与 C-TIRADS 分类之间以及 K-TIRADS 与 C-TIRADS 分类之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

三种 TIRADS 分类不利于鉴别 FTA 与 FTC。有必要开发一种新的滤泡状甲状腺肿瘤恶性风险分层系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验