Data Analytics and Knowledge Management, World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.
Health Economist, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 13;18(9):e0291371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291371. eCollection 2023.
Countries that are reforming their health systems to progress towards Universal Health Coverage (UHC) need to consider total resource requirements over the long term to plan for the implementation and sustainable financing of UHC. However, there is a lack of detailed conceptualization as to how the current health financing mechanisms interplay across health system elements. Thus, we aimed to generate evidence on how to utilize resources from different sources of funds in Africa. We conducted a scoping review of empirical research following the six-stage methodological framework for Scoping Review by Arksey & O'Malley and Levac, Colquhoun & O'Brien. We searched for published and grey literature in Medline, Cochrane Library, PubMed, WHO database, World bank and Google Scholar search engines databases and summarized data using a narrative approach, involving thematic syntheses and descriptive statistics. We included 156 studies out of 1,168 studies among which 13% were conceptual studies while 87% were empirical studies. These selected studies focused on the financing of the 13 health system elements. About 45% focused on service delivery, 13% on human resources, 5% on medical products, and 3% on infrastructure and governance. Studies reporting multiple health system elements were 8%, while health financing assessment frameworks was 23%. The publication years ranged from 1975 to 2021. While public sources were the most dominant form of financing, global documentation of health expenditure does not track funding on all the health system dimensions that informed the conceptual framework of this scoping review. There is a need to advocate for expenditure tracking for health systems, including intangibles. Further analysis would inform the development of a framework for assessing financing sources for health system elements based on efficiency, feasibility, sustainability, equity, and displacement.
正在改革其卫生系统以实现全民健康覆盖 (UHC) 的国家需要考虑长期内的总资源需求,为 UHC 的实施和可持续融资做好规划。然而,对于当前的卫生融资机制如何在卫生系统要素之间相互作用,缺乏详细的概念化。因此,我们旨在生成有关如何在非洲利用不同来源资金的资源的证据。我们按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 以及 Levac、Colquhoun 和 O'Brien 的六阶段方法框架进行了范围综述,对实证研究进行了综述。我们在 Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、世界卫生组织数据库、世界银行和 Google Scholar 搜索引擎数据库中搜索了已发表和灰色文献,并使用叙述方法汇总数据,涉及主题综合和描述性统计。我们从 1168 项研究中筛选出 156 项研究,其中 13%是概念性研究,87%是实证研究。这些选定的研究侧重于 13 个卫生系统要素的融资。约 45%的研究聚焦于服务提供,13%的研究聚焦于人力资源,5%的研究聚焦于医疗产品,3%的研究聚焦于基础设施和治理。报告多个卫生系统要素的研究占 8%,而卫生融资评估框架占 23%。研究的发表年份从 1975 年到 2021 年不等。虽然公共来源是最主要的融资形式,但全球卫生支出记录并未追踪所有告知本范围综述概念框架的卫生系统维度的资金。需要倡导对卫生系统进行支出跟踪,包括无形资产。进一步的分析将为制定基于效率、可行性、可持续性、公平性和替代的卫生系统要素融资来源评估框架提供信息。