Liu Xia, Min Leilei, Chang Yuru, Shen Yanjun, Wang Zhuoran, Shen Yan-Jun
CAS-Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei-Key Laboratory of Water Saving Agriculture, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050022, China.
Information Center (Hydrological Monitor and Forecast Center), Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing 100053, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:167002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167002. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Many groundwater construction projects such as South-to-North Water Diversion Project (SNWDP) were conducted for controlling groundwater overexploitation in the North China Plain (NCP). However, more insight is required into the magnitude and distribution of water table depth (WTD) in time and space over the NCP. This study evaluated the variability and the hotspots of WTD based on 83 unconfined monitoring wells and took trend, breakpoint, and time stability into consideration. We found the average WTD of unconfined aquifer for the Southern Hebei Plain generally increased continuously from 1998 to 2020 in spite of the operation of the SNWDP since 2014. However, the rise rate of WTD slows down in recent years and the WTD has decreased in certain subregions. We further divided these groundwater wells into five groups: climb accelerating (Group 1), increase decelerating (Group 2), first rise then descend (Group 3), first descend then rise (Group 4), decrease decelerating (Group 5), and reduce accelerating (Group 6). Moreover, we found that the number of wells that divided into Group1 to Group 5 account for 15 %, 41 %, 25 %, 18 %, and 1 % of the total number of observation wells. The breakpoints of all the wells are from 2001 to 2017 and most of the breakpoints were found before 2014, which demonstrates that other groundwater management strategies implemented in the Southern Hebei Plain prior to the operation of the SNWDP plays a crucial part. The hotspots area for group 1 is mainly distributed in the north region of Shijiazhuang City, group 2 is in southern region of piedmont plain, group 3 is in northern region of Baoding and south-west region of Xingtai City, and group 4 is in Cangzhou City and eastern region of Xingtai City. The method and framework of this study can be applied in other regions suffering from groundwater depletion.
许多地下水建设项目,如南水北调工程,都是为了控制华北平原的地下水超采而实施的。然而,对于华北平原地下水位深度(WTD)在时间和空间上的大小和分布,还需要更深入的了解。本研究基于83口无压监测井评估了地下水位深度的变异性和热点区域,并考虑了趋势、断点和时间稳定性。我们发现,尽管自2014年以来南水北调工程已投入运行,但冀南平原无压含水层的平均地下水位深度在1998年至2020年期间总体上持续上升。然而,近年来地下水位深度的上升速率放缓,并且在某些子区域地下水位深度有所下降。我们进一步将这些地下水井分为五组:上升加速组(第1组)、上升减速组(第2组)、先上升后下降组(第3组)、先下降后上升组(第4组)、下降减速组(第5组)和下降加速组(第6组)。此外,我们发现,分为第1组至第5组的井数分别占观测井总数的15%、41%、25%、18%和1%。所有井的断点出现在2001年至2017年之间,且大多数断点出现在2014年之前,这表明在南水北调工程运行之前冀南平原实施的其他地下水管理策略起到了关键作用。第1组的热点区域主要分布在石家庄市北部地区,第2组在山前平原南部地区,第3组在保定市北部地区和邢台市西南部地区,第4组在沧州市和邢台市东部地区。本研究的方法和框架可应用于其他遭受地下水枯竭的地区。