Suppr超能文献

心肺复苏期间手动和自动机械按压后的创伤性损伤:一项回顾性队列研究

Traumatic injuries after manual and automatic mechanical compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Preda Thierry, Nafi Matteo, Villa Michele, Cassina Tiziano

机构信息

Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2023 Sep 9;16:100465. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100465. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chest compressions during advanced cardiac life support is a life-saving, potential harmful procedure with high incidence of severe and life-threatening injuries. Previous studies suggest a possible correlation between the increased incidence of chest and/or abdominal trauma and the use of automatic mechanical compression devices.

METHODS

An observational monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted including all patients admitted to our Intensive Care Unit suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Canton Ticino (Switzerland) from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint was to describe any resuscitation-related body injury. The secondary endpoints were to explore possible predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) related injuries and their association with the 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

We included 335 patients, 287 treated with manual chest compressions, 48 mechanically assisted. 55.5% of all resuscitated patients presented severe, or life-threatening lesions. Skeletal and thoracic injuries were the most frequent lesions followed by abdominal injuries. Mechanical assisted resuscitated patients presented higher risk of bleeding (OR 5.9; 95% CI 2.9-11.6) and increased CPR-related injuries (aOR 6.2; 95% CI 2.5-15.4) compared to standard manual chest compressions. In particular higher number of extra-thoracic and life-threatening lesions were described among the mechanical assisted CPR group. Patients with life-threatening had statistically significant higher mortality at 30-days compared to the severe and lesion's free cohort.

CONCLUSION

Traumatic lesions occurred frequently after chest compression and their severity was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Mechanical devices, compared to manual chest compression, appear to be more harmful and may play a role in causing body lesions and hemorrhagic events.

摘要

引言

高级心脏生命支持期间的胸外按压是一种挽救生命但可能有害的操作,严重及危及生命的损伤发生率很高。先前的研究表明,胸部和/或腹部创伤发生率的增加与自动机械按压设备的使用之间可能存在关联。

方法

进行了一项单中心观察性回顾性队列研究,纳入了2012年至2021年在瑞士提契诺州因院外心脏骤停(OHCA)入住我们重症监护病房的所有患者。主要终点是描述任何与复苏相关的身体损伤。次要终点是探讨心肺复苏(CPR)相关损伤的可能预测因素及其与30天死亡率的关联。

结果

我们纳入了335例患者,其中287例接受了手动胸外按压,48例接受了机械辅助按压。所有复苏患者中有55.5%出现了严重或危及生命的损伤。骨骼和胸部损伤是最常见的损伤,其次是腹部损伤。与标准手动胸外按压相比,机械辅助复苏的患者出血风险更高(OR 5.9;95%CI 2.9 - 11.6),CPR相关损伤增加(校正OR 6.2;95%CI 2.5 - 15.4)。特别是在机械辅助CPR组中,胸外和危及生命的损伤数量更多。与严重损伤且无损伤的队列相比,有危及生命损伤的患者在30天时的死亡率在统计学上显著更高。

结论

胸外按压后创伤性损伤频繁发生,其严重程度与30天死亡率增加相关。与手动胸外按压相比,机械装置似乎更具危害性,可能在导致身体损伤和出血事件中起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a26b/10497787/0aa012ac0182/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验