Shorey Shefaly, Ng Esperanza Debby
Alice Lee Center for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.
Birth. 2023 Dec;50(4):749-763. doi: 10.1111/birt.12763. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
Normal physiologic birth has been shown to result in optimal maternal-infant outcomes, but the concept of physiologic birth is continually evolving. Midwives play an important role in advocating for normal physiologic birth; however, their perceptions of what this approach entails have not been systematically appraised.
In this qualitative review, we aimed to examine midwives' perceived meanings of "normal physiologic birth" and to describe their experiences facilitating such births.
Five electronic databases were searched, and 26 qualitative papers were included, representing a total of 433 midwives from different backgrounds (i.e., independent, home-based, community-based, and hospital-based). Eligible papers were assessed for quality, and then data were coded and synthesized thematically.
Four highly connected themes were generated: (1) the midwife: fundamental beliefs; (2) the woman: empowerment and advocacy; (3) the environment: ambience and culture; and (4) the team: need for institutional support and recognition. The fundamental beliefs of midwives, such as their perceived role and definition of normal physiologic birth and their self-confidence, influence practice styles and contribute to personal and professional development. Midwives often advocate for a person-centered approach that encouraged women's and other birthing person's autonomy and involvement in shared decision-making. The midwife-client relationship is also central. Most importantly, a conducive birthing environment and an inclusive workplace culture that encourages interprofessional support, collaboration, and recognizes midwifery practices were identified as crucial in providing optimal conditions for the facilitation of physiologic birth.
This review provides healthcare policymakers and institutions fresh impetus to evaluate and revise as needed current workplace policies to be more inclusive and supportive of midwifery practices and physiologic birth.
正常生理分娩已被证明能带来最佳的母婴结局,但生理分娩的概念在不断演变。助产士在倡导正常生理分娩方面发挥着重要作用;然而,她们对这种分娩方式具体内涵的认知尚未得到系统评估。
在这项定性综述中,我们旨在探讨助产士对“正常生理分娩”的认知意义,并描述她们在协助此类分娩过程中的经历。
检索了五个电子数据库,纳入了26篇定性研究论文,这些论文共涉及来自不同背景(即独立执业、居家分娩、社区分娩和医院分娩)的433名助产士。对符合条件的论文进行质量评估,然后对数据进行编码并进行主题综合分析。
生成了四个高度相关的主题:(1)助产士:基本信念;(2)产妇:赋权与支持;(3)环境:氛围与文化;(4)团队:需要机构支持与认可。助产士的基本信念,如她们对正常生理分娩的认知角色和定义以及她们的自信心,会影响实践风格,并有助于个人和职业发展。助产士通常倡导以人为主的方法,鼓励产妇及其他分娩者的自主性,并参与共同决策。助产士与服务对象的关系也很关键。最重要的是,一个有利于分娩的环境和一种包容的工作场所文化,鼓励跨专业支持与协作,并认可助产实践,被认为是为促进生理分娩提供最佳条件的关键因素。
本综述为医疗保健政策制定者和机构提供了新的动力,促使他们根据需要评估和修订当前的工作场所政策,使其更具包容性,并更支持助产实践和生理分娩。