Koya Bharath, Devane Karan, Fuentes Diana A Madrid, Mischo Seth H, Gayzik F Scott
Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Dec;193:107283. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107283. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
The objective of the current study was to perform a preliminary validation of the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) average male occupant models, simplified (M50-OS) and detailed (M50-O) and the 70YO aged model in Far-side impacts and compare the head kinematics against the PMHS responses published by Petit et al. (2019). The buck used to simulate the far-side impacts comprised a seat, headrest, center console plate, leg support plate, and footrest plate with rigid material properties. The three occupant models were gravity settled onto the rigid seat and belted with a 3-point seatbelt. Positioning details of the PMHS were followed in the model setup process. A deceleration pulse with ΔV of 8 m/s was applied. The far-side crash simulations were performed with and without the addition of a plexiglass cover around the setup similar to the experimental setup. The head kinematics were extracted from the models for comparison against the PMHS data. Peak head displacements in Y and Z axes from the three models were compared to the PMHS data in addition to the head rotation along X axes. The peak head displacement values for the M50-OS, M50-O, and M50-O 70YO aged models are 594.10 mm, 568.44 mm, and 567.90 mm along Y and 325.21 mm, 402.66 mm, and 375.92 mm respectively along Z when the plexiglass cover is included in the test. The peak head rotation values for the M50-OS, M50-O, and M50-O 70YO aged models are 95.64°, 122.15°, and 129.08° respectively when the plexiglass cover is included in the test. The three occupant models capture the general trend of the PMHS data. The detailed occupant models have higher head rotation compared to the simplified model because of the deformable structure of the spine and intervertebral discs modeled. These three occupant models can be used for further parametric studies in this condition to study the influence of restraint parameters.
本研究的目的是对全球人体模型联盟(GHBMC)的平均男性乘员模型(简化版M50 - OS和详细版M50 - O)以及70岁老年模型在远侧碰撞中的情况进行初步验证,并将头部运动学与Petit等人(2019年)发表的PMHS响应进行比较。用于模拟远侧碰撞的台车包括具有刚性材料特性的座椅、头枕、中控台板、腿部支撑板和脚踏板。这三种乘员模型在重力作用下安置在刚性座椅上,并用三点式安全带系好。在模型设置过程中遵循了PMHS的定位细节。施加了一个ΔV为8 m/s的减速脉冲。在设置周围添加和不添加类似于实验设置的有机玻璃罩的情况下进行远侧碰撞模拟。从模型中提取头部运动学数据以与PMHS数据进行比较。除了沿X轴的头部旋转外,还将这三种模型在Y和Z轴上的头部峰值位移与PMHS数据进行了比较。当测试中包括有机玻璃罩时,M50 - OS、M50 - O和70岁的M50 - O老年模型在Y轴上的头部峰值位移值分别为594.10 mm、568.44 mm和567.90 mm,在Z轴上分别为325.21 mm、402.66 mm和375.92 mm。当测试中包括有机玻璃罩时,M50 - OS、M50 - O和70岁的M50 - O老年模型的头部峰值旋转值分别为95.64°、122.15°和129.08°。这三种乘员模型捕捉到了PMHS数据的总体趋势。由于对脊柱和椎间盘进行了可变形建模,详细的乘员模型与简化模型相比具有更高的头部旋转。这三种乘员模型可用于在此条件下进一步的参数研究,以研究约束参数的影响。