Suppr超能文献

三种不同正畸磨牙管脱落后对釉质表面剪切粘结强度和残留粘结剂残余的比较:扫描电镜研究。

Comparison of shear bond strength and residual adhesive remnants on the enamel surface after debonding of three different orthodontic molar tubes : A scanning electron microscope study.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University, 1st Street, Emek, Ankara, Turkey.

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

J Orofac Orthop. 2024 May;85(Suppl 1):94-101. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00496-w. Epub 2023 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim for this research was to evaluate and compare the impact, bond strength, and residual adhesive on the enamel surface after debonding of different orthodontic molar tubes. The tested materials were metal, composite, and newly introduced ceramic orthodontic molar tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In all, 66 first molar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Metal, glass-fiber composite and ceramic orthodontic molar tubes were bonded and shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding were recorded and the enamel surfaces were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the adhesives were cleaned.

RESULTS

The mean SBS values of the metal and ceramic tube groups were significantly higher than that of the glass-fiber composite tube group. The highest SBS values were recorded for the ceramic tube group (11.09 ± 2.51 MPa). Failure typically occurred at the adhesive-enamel interface in the ceramic group, whereas the majority of the samples in the glass-fiber composite group showed failure at the adhesive-tube base interface according to ARI and SEM investigations. ARI 1 and ARI 2 scores were commonly observed for the metal tube group.

CONCLUSIONS

All the molar tubes tested had generated clinically acceptable SBS values; however, the values for glass-fiber composite molar tubes were significantly lower than those for the ceramic and metal molar tubes. If the debonding procedure is performed carefully, the ceramic molar tubes may be an enamel-safe product for patients seeking fully esthetic orthodontic treatment.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估和比较不同正畸磨牙管对釉质表面的影响、粘结强度和残留粘结剂。测试材料为金属、复合和新引入的陶瓷正畸磨牙管。

材料和方法

共 66 颗第一磨牙随机分为三组。金属、玻璃纤维增强复合和陶瓷正畸磨牙管进行粘结,进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。记录脱粘后的粘结残留指数(ARI)评分,并在清除粘结剂后使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察釉质表面。

结果

金属管和陶瓷管组的平均 SBS 值明显高于玻璃纤维增强复合管组。陶瓷管组的 SBS 值最高(11.09±2.51 MPa)。根据 ARI 和 SEM 研究,陶瓷组中典型的失效发生在粘结-釉质界面,而玻璃纤维增强复合组中的大多数样本显示粘结-管基底界面失效。金属管组常见 ARI 1 和 ARI 2 评分。

结论

所有测试的磨牙管均产生了临床可接受的 SBS 值;然而,玻璃纤维增强复合磨牙管的值明显低于陶瓷和金属磨牙管。如果仔细进行脱粘程序,陶瓷磨牙管可能是寻求全美学正畸治疗的患者的一种安全釉质产品。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验