Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University, 1st Street, Emek, Ankara, Turkey.
Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Near East University, Nicosia, Cyprus.
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 May;85(Suppl 1):94-101. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00496-w. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
The aim for this research was to evaluate and compare the impact, bond strength, and residual adhesive on the enamel surface after debonding of different orthodontic molar tubes. The tested materials were metal, composite, and newly introduced ceramic orthodontic molar tubes.
In all, 66 first molar teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Metal, glass-fiber composite and ceramic orthodontic molar tubes were bonded and shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores after debonding were recorded and the enamel surfaces were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after the adhesives were cleaned.
The mean SBS values of the metal and ceramic tube groups were significantly higher than that of the glass-fiber composite tube group. The highest SBS values were recorded for the ceramic tube group (11.09 ± 2.51 MPa). Failure typically occurred at the adhesive-enamel interface in the ceramic group, whereas the majority of the samples in the glass-fiber composite group showed failure at the adhesive-tube base interface according to ARI and SEM investigations. ARI 1 and ARI 2 scores were commonly observed for the metal tube group.
All the molar tubes tested had generated clinically acceptable SBS values; however, the values for glass-fiber composite molar tubes were significantly lower than those for the ceramic and metal molar tubes. If the debonding procedure is performed carefully, the ceramic molar tubes may be an enamel-safe product for patients seeking fully esthetic orthodontic treatment.
本研究旨在评估和比较不同正畸磨牙管对釉质表面的影响、粘结强度和残留粘结剂。测试材料为金属、复合和新引入的陶瓷正畸磨牙管。
共 66 颗第一磨牙随机分为三组。金属、玻璃纤维增强复合和陶瓷正畸磨牙管进行粘结,进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。记录脱粘后的粘结残留指数(ARI)评分,并在清除粘结剂后使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察釉质表面。
金属管和陶瓷管组的平均 SBS 值明显高于玻璃纤维增强复合管组。陶瓷管组的 SBS 值最高(11.09±2.51 MPa)。根据 ARI 和 SEM 研究,陶瓷组中典型的失效发生在粘结-釉质界面,而玻璃纤维增强复合组中的大多数样本显示粘结-管基底界面失效。金属管组常见 ARI 1 和 ARI 2 评分。
所有测试的磨牙管均产生了临床可接受的 SBS 值;然而,玻璃纤维增强复合磨牙管的值明显低于陶瓷和金属磨牙管。如果仔细进行脱粘程序,陶瓷磨牙管可能是寻求全美学正畸治疗的患者的一种安全釉质产品。