Graduate School, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):441-452. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000776.
Considering the difficulty of treating complex anal fistula (CAF), various surgical techniques exist in clinical work. However, none are ideal. Evidence on the efficacy and safety of different surgical treatments is scarce. The authors aimed to compare the outcomes of the 13 surgical techniques and tried to find the best surgical method for treating CAF.
The authors searched worldwide databases, including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and SinoMed, from inception to March 2023. All randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of 13 surgical techniques were included according to the PICO principles. The indicators of the cure rate, the recurrence rate, the complication rate, the operating time, the postoperative pain on day 1 (VAS), and the postoperative incontinence in month 1 (Wexner) were extracted and analyzed using STATA software 15.1, Review Manager 5.4, and GeMTC14.3.
Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials with a total of 2274 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the comparison among any surgical interventions in terms of the cure rate ( P >0.05 Table 2) and recurrence rate ( P >0.05 Table 3). However, in terms of complication rate, fistulectomy was lower than FPS (Median: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.02-0.70) or fistulotomy (Median: 0.09; 95% CI: 0.01-0.55), and fistulotomy was lower than EAFR (Median: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.05-0.84), LIFT (Median: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.02-0.66) or LIFT-EAFR (Median: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.69) ( P >0.05 Table 4). The surface estimated the advantages and disadvantages under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA). The ranking results indicated that fistulectomy might have the lowest complication rate (SUCRA=7.9%). Because the network results of the operating time, the postoperative pain, and the postoperative incontinence contained no closed loops, the results of their probability ranking could only be referenced, demonstrating that fistulectomy might have the shortest operating time (SUCRA=23.4%), video-assisted modified ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (VAMLIFT) might have the lowest postoperative pain on day 1 (VAS) (SUCRA=0.4%) and LIFT might have the lowest postoperative incontinence in month 1(Wexner) (SUCRA=16.2%).
Fistulectomy might have the lowest complication rate, which might be the relatively superior surgical technique for treating CAF.
鉴于治疗复杂性肛痿(CAF)的难度,临床工作中存在各种手术技术。然而,没有一种是理想的。关于不同手术治疗效果和安全性的证据稀缺。作者旨在比较 13 种手术技术的结果,并尝试找到治疗 CAF 的最佳手术方法。
作者从全球数据库中检索文献,包括 Pubmed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、CNKI、万仿、VIP 和 SinoMed,从建立到 2023 年 3 月。根据 PICO 原则,纳入了比较 13 种手术技术结果的所有随机对照试验。使用 STATA 软件 15.1、Review Manager 5.4 和 GeMTC14.3 提取并分析治愈率、复发率、并发症率、手术时间、术后第 1 天疼痛(VAS)和术后第 1 个月失禁(Wexner)的指标。
网络荟萃分析纳入了 28 项随机对照试验,共 2274 名患者。任何手术干预在治愈率(P>0.05,表 2)和复发率(P>0.05,表 3)方面均无统计学差异。然而,在并发症率方面,切开挂线术低于经括约肌间瘘管结扎术(FPS)(中位数:0.14;95%CI:0.02-0.70)或切开术(中位数:0.09;95%CI:0.01-0.55),切开术低于经肛内镜下 Miles 括约肌切除术(EAFR)(中位数:0.24;95%CI:0.05-0.84)、括约肌间切开术(LIFT)(中位数:0.17;95%CI:0.02-0.66)或 LIFT-EAFR(中位数:0.11;95%CI:0.01-0.69)(P>0.05,表 4)。表面估计了累积排名下的优缺点(SUCRA)。排名结果表明,切开挂线术可能具有最低的并发症发生率(SUCRA=7.9%)。由于手术时间、术后疼痛和术后失禁的网络结果不含闭合循环,因此只能参考其概率排名的结果,表明切开挂线术可能具有最短的手术时间(SUCRA=23.4%)、视频辅助改良经括约肌间瘘管结扎术(VAMLIFT)可能具有最低的术后第 1 天疼痛(VAS)(SUCRA=0.4%),而 LIFT 可能具有最低的术后第 1 个月失禁(Wexner)(SUCRA=16.2%)。
切开挂线术可能具有最低的并发症发生率,这可能是治疗 CAF 的相对优势手术技术。