Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun;274(4):963-979. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01690-y. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
Emerging evidence suggests the usefulness of psychological interventions targeting metacognitive change mechanisms in patients experiencing psychosis. Although many of these patients are treated in acute psychiatric contexts, only few studies have adapted such interventions for acute inpatient settings. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical outcomes of a novel modularized group intervention focusing on different aspects of metacognitive change mechanisms. In particular, the intervention aims to reduce patients' acute symptoms by enhancing cognitive insight and to relieve distress via cognitive defusion (i.e. coping). A sample of 37 participants with acute psychosis received up to nine sessions of the intervention. Baseline and post-intervention assessments were conducted for general psychopathology, psychotic symptoms, global functioning, and symptom distress. Measures of change mechanisms were assessed before and after the respective treatment module. Participants' experiences were explored in feedback questionnaires and interviews. Recruitment, retention, and attendance rate met the pre-set feasibility benchmark of 80%. The intervention was well received by participants, who emphasised the group's clear structure, positive atmosphere, and helpful contents. Response rates were high and linear mixed models revealed significant medium-to-large time effects on all clinical outcomes. As expected, increase in hypothesised change mechanisms cognitive insight and decrease in cognitive fusion was found. However, the uncontrolled design limits interpreting clinical effects. The study provides evidence that an intervention based on a metacognitive model is feasible and acceptable for acute inpatients with psychosis. Positive results on clinical outcomes and change mechanisms warrant further exploration in a randomized controlled trial.
新出现的证据表明,针对精神病患者元认知改变机制的心理干预措施具有一定的作用。尽管许多患者在急性精神病学环境中接受治疗,但只有少数研究针对急性住院环境对这些干预措施进行了调整。本研究旨在评估一种新型模块化团体干预措施的可行性、可接受性和初步临床效果,该干预措施侧重于元认知改变机制的不同方面。特别是,该干预措施旨在通过提高认知洞察力来减轻患者的急性症状,并通过认知消解(即应对)来缓解痛苦。一组 37 名急性精神病患者接受了最多 9 次干预。在干预前和干预后对一般精神病学、精神病症状、总体功能和症状困扰进行了评估。在各自的治疗模块之前和之后评估了变化机制的测量。参与者的经验在反馈问卷和访谈中进行了探索。招募、保留和出勤率达到了 80%的预设可行性基准。该干预措施受到了参与者的好评,他们强调了小组清晰的结构、积极的氛围和有益的内容。反应率很高,线性混合模型显示所有临床结果都有显著的中到大时间效应。正如预期的那样,假设的变化机制认知洞察力增加,认知融合减少。然而,非控制设计限制了对临床效果的解释。该研究为基于元认知模型的干预措施在急性精神病住院患者中是可行和可接受的提供了证据。在临床结果和变化机制方面的积极结果需要在随机对照试验中进一步探索。