Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
School of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
LGBT Health. 2023 Sep;10(S1):S10-S19. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2023.0076.
This study examines adolescents' self-reported school-based developmental assets and four intersecting social positions as they relate to prevalence of bullying involvement. Participants were 80,456 ninth and 11th grade students who participated in the 2019 Minnesota Student Survey (30.2% youth of color; 11% lesbian/gay/bisexual/pansexual/queer/questioning; 2.9% transgender/gender diverse [TGD] or gender questioning). Exhaustive Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis was used to identify school-based developmental assets (i.e., school safety, school adult support) and intersecting social positions (i.e., sexual identity; gender identity/modality; racial/ethnic identity; physical disabilities/chronic illness; and/or mental health/behavioral/emotional problems) associated with the highest prevalence of involvement as physical and relational bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Adolescents with 2+ marginalized social positions who often lacked school-based developmental assets were part of nearly all the highest prevalence bullying involvement groups. TGD and gender questioning adolescents, Native American youth, and youth living with both physical disabilities/chronic illness and mental health/emotional/behavioral problems-most of whom had additional marginalized social positions and lacked school-based assets-were particularly overrepresented in high prevalence groups. For example, 31.1% of TGD or gender questioning youth of color living with both types of disabilities/health problems who did not feel strongly that school was safe reported involvement as physical bully-victims-nearly six times the sample average rate. Adolescents with multiple marginalized social positions and those lacking certain school-based assets-often overlapping categories-were involved in bullying at higher-than-average rates. Findings underscore the need for schools to address intersecting experiences of stigma and structural oppression that may perpetuate bullying involvement disparities.
本研究考察了青少年自我报告的学校发展资产以及四个交叉社会地位与欺凌参与的普遍性之间的关系。参与者为 80456 名九年级和十一年级学生,他们参加了 2019 年明尼苏达州学生调查(30.2%的有色人种青年;11%的同性恋/双性恋/泛性恋/变性/变性/变性;2.9%的跨性别/性别多样化[跨性别]或性别质疑)。穷尽的卡方自动交互检测分析用于识别与作为身体和关系欺凌者、受害者和欺凌受害者的最高参与率相关的学校发展资产(即学校安全、学校成人支持)和交叉社会地位(即性认同;性别认同/模式;种族/民族认同;身体残疾/慢性疾病;和/或心理健康/行为/情绪问题)。拥有 2 个以上边缘化社会地位且经常缺乏学校发展资产的青少年几乎都属于参与率最高的欺凌群体的一部分。跨性别和性别质疑青少年、美国原住民青年以及同时患有身体残疾/慢性疾病和心理健康/情绪/行为问题的青年——其中大多数人拥有更多的边缘化社会地位且缺乏学校发展资产——在高参与率群体中尤为突出。例如,31.1%的有色人种跨性别或性别质疑青年同时患有这两种残疾/健康问题,他们对学校的安全性没有强烈的感觉,但他们报告自己是身体欺凌受害者——几乎是样本平均水平的六倍。拥有多个边缘化社会地位和缺乏某些学校发展资产的青少年(通常是重叠的类别)的欺凌行为发生率高于平均水平。研究结果强调了学校需要解决交叉的耻辱感和结构性压迫经验,这些经验可能会加剧欺凌参与的差异。