Paranjape Vaidehi V, Henao-Guerrero Natalia, Menciotti Giulio, Saksena Siddharth
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Sep 14;10:1238549. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1238549. eCollection 2023.
This study investigated the performance among four cardiac output (CO) monitoring techniques in comparison with the reference method intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (iPATD) and their ability to diagnose fluid responsiveness (FR) during a modified passive leg raise (PLR) maneuver in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs undergoing acute blood volume manipulations. The study also examined the simultaneous effect of performing the PLR on dynamic variables such as stroke distance variation (SDV), peak velocity variation (PVV), and stroke volume variation (SVV).
Prospective, nonrandomized, crossover design.
Six healthy male Beagle dogs.
The dogs were anesthetized with propofol and isoflurane and mechanically ventilated under neuromuscular blockade. After instrumentation, they underwent a series of sequential, nonrandomized steps: Step 1: baseline data collection; Step 2: removal of 33 mL kg of circulating blood volume; Step 3: blood re-transfusion; and Step 4: infusion of 20 mL kg colloid solution. Following a 10-min stabilization period after each step, CO measurements were recorded using esophageal Doppler (ED), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), arterial pressure waveform analysis (APWA), and electrical cardiometry (EC). Additionally, SDV, PVV, and SVV were recorded. Intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution (iPATD) measurements were also recorded before, during, and after the PLR maneuver. A successful FR diagnosis made using a specific test indicated that CO increased by more than 15% during the PLR maneuver. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures with Tukey test, linear regression, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc), and Bland-Altman analysis. Statistical significance was set at < 0.05.
All techniques detected a reduction in CO ( < 0.001) during hemorrhage and an increase in CO after blood re-transfusion and colloid infusion ( < 0.001) compared with baseline. During hemorrhage, CO increases with the PLR maneuver were as follows: 33% for iPATD ( < 0.001), 19% for EC ( = 0.03), 7% for APWA ( = 0.97), 39% for TEE ( < 0.001), and 17% for ED ( = 0.02). Concurrently, decreases in SVV, SDV, and PVV values ( < 0.001) were also observed. The percentage error for TEE, ED, and EC was less than 30% but exceeded 55% for APWA. While TEE and EC slightly underestimated iPATD values, ED and APWA significantly overestimated iPATD values. TEE and EC exhibited good and acceptable agreement with iPATD. However, CO measurements using all four techniques and iPATD did not differ before, during, and after PLR at baseline, blood re-transfusion, and colloid infusion.
iPATD, EC, TEE, and ED effectively assessed FR in hypovolemic dogs during the PLR maneuver, while the performance of APWA was unacceptable and not recommended. SVV, SDV, and PVV could be used to monitor CO changes during PLR and acute blood volume manipulations, suggesting their potential clinical utility.
本研究调查了四种心输出量(CO)监测技术与参考方法间歇性肺动脉热稀释法(iPATD)相比的性能,以及它们在异氟烷麻醉下接受急性血容量操作的犬类进行改良被动抬腿(PLR)操作期间诊断液体反应性(FR)的能力。该研究还检查了进行PLR对动态变量如搏出距离变化(SDV)、峰值速度变化(PVV)和搏出量变化(SVV)的同时影响。
前瞻性、非随机、交叉设计。
六只健康雄性比格犬。
犬只使用丙泊酚和异氟烷麻醉,并在神经肌肉阻滞下进行机械通气。仪器安装后,它们经历了一系列连续的、非随机步骤:步骤1:收集基线数据;步骤2:去除33 mL/kg的循环血容量;步骤3:输血;步骤4:输注20 mL/kg胶体溶液。在每个步骤后的10分钟稳定期后,使用食管多普勒(ED)、经食管超声心动图(TEE)、动脉压波形分析(APWA)和心电描记法(EC)记录CO测量值。此外,记录SDV、PVV和SVV。在PLR操作前、操作期间和操作后也记录间歇性肺动脉热稀释法(iPATD)测量值。使用特定测试做出的成功FR诊断表明,在PLR操作期间CO增加超过15%。使用重复测量的单因素方差分析、Tukey检验、线性回归、Lin一致性相关系数(ρc)和Bland-Altman分析进行统计分析。设定统计学显著性为<0.05。
与基线相比,所有技术均检测到出血期间CO降低(<0.001)以及输血和胶体输注后CO增加(<0.001)。在出血期间,PLR操作导致的CO增加如下:iPATD为33%(<0.001),EC为19%(=0.03),APWA为7%(=0.97),TEE为39%(<0.001),ED为17%(=0.02)。同时,还观察到SVV、SDV和PVV值降低(<0.001)。TEE、ED和EC的百分比误差小于30%,但APWA超过55%。虽然TEE和EC略微低估了iPATD值,但ED和APWA显著高估了iPATD值。TEE和EC与iPATD表现出良好且可接受的一致性。然而,在基线、输血和胶体输注时,使用所有四种技术和iPATD进行的CO测量在PLR操作前、操作期间和操作后没有差异。
iPATD、EC、TEE和ED在PLR操作期间有效地评估了低血容量犬的FR,而APWA的性能不可接受,不建议使用。SVV、SDV和PVV可用于监测PLR和急性血容量操作期间的CO变化,表明它们具有潜在的临床应用价值。