Department of Acute, Chronic & Continuing Care, School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamaUSA.
Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamaUSA.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023 Dec;38(6):780-783. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X23006428. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
Uncontrolled trauma-related hemorrhage remains the primary preventable cause of death among those with critical injury.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the types of trauma associated with critical injury and trauma-related hemorrhage, and to determine the time to definitive care among patients treated at major trauma centers who were predicted to require massive transfusion.
A secondary analysis was performed of the Pragmatic, Randomized, Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial data (N = 680). All patients included were predicted to require massive transfusion and admitted to one of 12 North American trauma centers. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize patients, including demographics, type and mechanism of injury, source of bleeding, and receipt of prehospital interventions. Patient time to definitive care was determined using the time from activation of emergency services to responder arrival on scene, and time from scene departure to emergency department (ED) arrival. Each interval was calculated and then summed for a total time to definitive care.
Patients were primarily white (63.8%), male (80.3%), with a median age of 34 (IQR 24-51) years. Roughly one-half of patients experienced blunt (49.0%) versus penetrating (48.2%) injury. The most common types of blunt trauma were motor vehicle injuries (83.5%), followed by falls (9.3%), other (3.6%), assaults (1.8%), and incidents due to machinery (1.8%). The most common types of penetrating injuries were gunshot wounds (72.3%), stabbings (24.1%), other (2.1%), and impalements (1.5%). One-third of patients (34.5%) required some prehospital intervention, including intubation (77.4%), chest or needle decompression (18.8%), tourniquet (18.4%), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; 5.6%). Sources of bleeding included the abdomen (44.3%), chest (20.4%), limb/extremity (18.2%), pelvis (11.4%), and other (5.7%). Patients waited for a median of six (IQR4-10) minutes for emergency responders to arrive at the scene of injury and traveled a median of 27 (IQR 19-42) minutes to an ED. Time to definitive care was a median of 57 (IQR 44-77) minutes, with a range of 12-232 minutes. Twenty-four-hour mortality was 15% (n = 100) with 81 patients dying due to exsanguination or hemorrhage.
Patients who experience critical injury may experience lengthy times to receipt of definitive care and may benefit from bystander action for hemorrhage control to improve patient outcomes.
创伤相关的失控性出血是导致重伤患者死亡的首要可预防原因。
本研究旨在评估与重伤相关的创伤类型和创伤相关出血,并确定在预测需要大量输血的患者中,送往主要创伤中心治疗的患者接受确定性治疗的时间。
对 Pragmatic, Randomized, Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) 试验数据(N = 680)进行二次分析。所有纳入的患者均预计需要大量输血,并被收入北美 12 家创伤中心之一。使用描述性统计数据对患者特征进行描述,包括人口统计学特征、损伤类型和机制、出血源以及接受院前干预的情况。使用从紧急服务激活到急救人员到达现场的时间以及从现场出发到急诊部(ED)到达的时间来确定患者接受确定性治疗的时间。计算每个时间段,然后将其相加得出接受确定性治疗的总时间。
患者主要为白人(63.8%)、男性(80.3%),中位年龄为 34 岁(IQR 24-51)。大约一半的患者经历了钝性(49.0%)与穿透性(48.2%)损伤。最常见的钝性创伤类型是机动车事故(83.5%),其次是跌倒(9.3%)、其他(3.6%)、袭击(1.8%)和机器事故(1.8%)。最常见的穿透性创伤类型是枪伤(72.3%)、刺伤(24.1%)、其他(2.1%)和穿刺伤(1.5%)。三分之一的患者(34.5%)需要接受一些院前干预,包括插管(77.4%)、胸部或针减压(18.8%)、止血带(18.4%)和心肺复苏术(CPR;5.6%)。出血源包括腹部(44.3%)、胸部(20.4%)、肢体/四肢(18.2%)、骨盆(11.4%)和其他(5.7%)。患者等待急救人员到达受伤现场的中位时间为 6 分钟(IQR 4-10),前往 ED 的中位时间为 27 分钟(IQR 19-42)。接受确定性治疗的中位时间为 57 分钟(IQR 44-77),范围为 12-232 分钟。24 小时死亡率为 15%(n = 100),81 例患者因出血或失血而死亡。
经历重伤的患者可能需要较长时间才能接受确定性治疗,并且可能受益于旁观者控制出血的行动,以改善患者的结局。